User talk:Marvel Lords

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. >>> Extorc.talk 14:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:CosmicEmperor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CosmicEmperor. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvel Lords (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Marvel Lords (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Marvel Lords (talk) 09:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marvel Lords (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/CosmicEmperor/Archive#27_September_2022 The above analysis concludes that only CosmicEmperor can ask questions on reference desk and teahouse I asked questions at Reference_desk/Humanities on first edit with Knight Skywalker account, signed as ZebraLounge before username change. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities&diff=prev&oldid=1046524648 I asked questions on teahouse with Knight Skywalker account. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Knight_Skywalker#Your_thread_has_been_archived_2 Lords and Knight are similar in medieval stories. Marvel and Skywalker both are related to movies. It's possible Emperor stays in same country area and uses same ISP. He is inactive for years and had no interaction with Extorc and Venkat TL. Someone who had username Avengers will create Marvel so that everyone will suspect? CosmicEmperor's old archives show that his range is used by multiple users. Example- Comment made by BB23 Fatima Begum from downtown is technically Possible to CosmicEmperor. To connect the account to CE purely because they may use the same IP ranges is insufficient. There needs to be behavioral diffs comparing Fatima to previously blocked named accounts, and in this instance that would be very hard given that Fatima has made only one edit. The amount of activity on these ranges is significant and the number of blocked socks on these ranges is proportionally substantial. Yet, most of those socks are CU-blocked without tags, including several by me, because of the inability to connect them persuasively to a specific master. I have done the same thing with Fatima, i.e., blocked without a tag.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Comment by Ivanvector Thanks, case closed. Responding to Smsarmad's comment above: as I understand it there are several sockmasters operating within a similar IP range, along with several unrelated users, so in these cases technical data is not of much use without better behavioural evidence. Since we can already show by behaviour that this account is the same as another blocked account, we can block it, so there's no real benefit to running CU here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Marvel Lords (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Regardless, you seem to be admitting to using multiple accounts, so the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.