User talk:Martyn Smith

Welcome!

Hello, Martyn Smith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 22:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 10 Edit

I guess in removing the nonsense entry, "*1988 - Jordan Dominguez, bass player (Catch Your Breath)," I inadvertendly removed a notable entry as well. I spend a large amount of time on Wikipedia maintaining the quality of Wikicalendar pages, so it's to be expected that here and there I'll make an error. Sorry for the inconvenience. Fabricationary 01:19, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hello Martyn. I hear you've been speaking to Linda. I removed your email address from your home page. Wikipedia is mirrored all over the place, and your address may have reached places or spambots you wouldn't have imagined. I've replaced it with the equivalent (anonymous) Wiki facility (I hope). Cheers, Ian Cairns 18:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on User talk:68.103.222.249

Although you may have been very frustrated with this anonymous user, it isn't considered appropriate to call anyone a moron on Wikipedia - see the no personal attacks policy. Next time, consider using a template message instead. Supadawg - Talk 18:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Furor vs. Furore

Regarding your edit to subliminal message, "furor" is the American spelling of the word. Just thought its's worth mentioning so you won't wonder if someone reverts it. -- DImfeld 01:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Fiction

Hi, noticed that you created a new article for an Itchy and Scratchy episode, since the article is so light on information maybe we should merge and redirect that article with List of Itchy and Scratchy Cartoons. Since the I&S episodes are so short there might be a problem of having 30-40 perma-stubs if we make an article for every article, instead of having one list to cover all of them. Drop me a line. --e ivind ^t ^@^c 23:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK! --e ivind ^t ^@^c 23:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pipe

Hi. The | symbol is called a Vertical bar or pipe. There should be one on your keyboard somewhere. Mine is to the left of z, requiring the shift button. Otherwise there should be one in the 'insert character box' that appears when you edit a page. It's between the ~ and ° symbols. Hope that's help.
SLUMGUM yap stalk 14:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mastermind

What's your specialist subject? SLUMGUM yap stalk 01:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiholic

Sorry, we've got a policy against articles on neologisms. The article's been deleted.

Thank you for trying, though; I know you meant well. DS 04:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy, daisy ✿✿✿

Hi, I just noticed your addition to 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) about computers regurgitating data as they're being destroyed. I have to say this all sounds a bit far-fetched, but it would be a great story if it was true. Can you provide any references to back this story up?

Oh and by the way, good luck with Mastermind on Thursday. And happy birthday! -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 14:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Mediation Cabal case

Hi, there. Concerning your mediation cabal case, I just came to inform you that the title for the page was left blank, making some difficulties with the case title. I have renamed and moved your case to Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-08 Casablanca so it is properly formatted. Thanks. Cowman109^Talk 22:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no response from any of the parties involved with this case for some time. Unless you or one of the other parties responds on the mediation page before July 20, I will close the mediation. Rick Norwood 12:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Today is July 20. Not having heard from any of the parties involved, I am closing the case. Rick Norwood 14:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Block"

Generally speaking, if you are able to edit anything other than your own talk page, your address is not blocked. Exceptions apply, though: I don't suppose you are using AOL? — Jul. 9, '06 [20:08] <freak|talk>

In the meantime you might try using an external web browser. Try making an anonymous edit using something other than the AOL browser and see if you aren't editing from a completely different IP range. — Jul. 9, '06 [20:22] <freak|talk>

Be forewarned about AOL#Account cancellation, allow yourself at least an hour. — Jul. 9, '06 [20:24] <freak|talk>

Aston Villa/Doug Ellis pages

I'll leave it with you, do what you will, but I would suggest that a proviso is added that Villa have denied the statement was made in the way it was reported - and the Birmingham Mail are now reported it was just the work of ONE disgruntled player Gretnagod 12:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plot-driven and character-driven

Hi. I redirected both of these stubs into the article Plot. We don't normally create separate articles for adjectives. Deb 21:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Returning the compliment

Thanks for noticing my edit of George Tootoosis. I appreciate the positive reinforcement.Konczewski 18:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Bleech

I believe you are mistaken in thinking that the Billy Bleech sketches where he utters: someone's sitting there, mate are unconnected to Bleech. You are wrong, he wears the mop wig, the gag even began in Billy's local pub. i suggest you re-watch series 3 Foxearth

Removal of links

Please don't remove links from articles unless no article should ever be created with that title. Red links are extremely useful when writing new articles. Warofdreams talk 15:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite Son

I'll give you the quickie rundown. if you are already familiar with the US election system, then this will be review. In short, candidates for the presidency run in primary elections and earn delegates that go to national conventions. Those delegates are traditionally pledged to a candidate. Of late, the convention is a bit of an anachronism since there is usually a candidate with more than enough delegates to win.

However, let's assume that there isn't a clear winner. A "favorite son" is a candidate who runs from his/her home state hoping to win a majority of that state's delegates. It allows that person to hold those delegates in order to influence the selection of the party's candidate. If you go into the convention and no one wins on the first ballot, candidates will start to drop out and their delegates can move towards other candidates. This is where the favorite some candidate can have influence. He can announce support for a particular person and ask his delegates to support that person. If that candidate ultimately wins, it can certainly benefit the person who pledged his delegates.

Again, since conventions are no longer brokered, this is a unlikely scenario going forward. But in the early part of US History, this was extremely common.Montco 03:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's New Pussycat? (song)

A tag has been placed on What's New Pussycat? (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. iced kola^(Mmm...) 00:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy

I added some info and a source. Happy editing and cheers. Dloh cierekim 03:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Martyn Smith! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jack Rollins (producer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nicholas Padfield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Mark Ryan (The Kid). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rachel Dax

The article Rachel Dax has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources suitable to satisfy the general notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 14:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead as far as I'm concerned Martyn Smith (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Radcliffe and Maconie

Just being nosy: did you get a reply to, or acknowledgement of, your email to Radcliffe & Maconie concerning Merry Men? --88.104.35.41 (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your lack of response. --88.104.35.41 (talk) 04:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you visit my talk again, it's not possible to really respond to someone who only uses an IP address and doesn't have a proper Wikipedia log in AFAICS Martyn Smith (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have responded to me to tell me that it's not possible to respond to me.

You are a confusing man. I will assume at this point that you think the answer is none of my business and leave you be.

Best, 88.104.35.41 (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that at all. I didn't think you'd be able to see any response to me on here unless you proactively looked on my talk page. Did you receive a 'new messages' prompt to tell you that I'd written the above? I'm not sure how it works; previously I'd only ever written to the talk pages of named registered editors.

To answer the question, no I did not get any reply or acknowledgement from the show, unfortunately. All we can do is hope that the show's production team read the email and will ask the presenters to desist from similar activity in future. Regards Martyn Smith (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! I understand the confusion now. Yes, it is possible for an IP editor to monitor a page without repeat visits – eg. by running the Atom feed of a page history through a feed reader (though I removed said feed when I said I'd depart). Thanks for the reply. --88.104.35.41 (talk) 17:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Polly Samson

Hi, interesting note you left on the PS talk page (although strictly speaking it doesn't really belong there, as the talk page is for discussion about improvements to the article, and not thoughts/observations about the subject). Would you mind moving it to the bottom of the page so that the posts appear in chronological order? Thanks. Writegeist (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted trivial observation I made over 5 years ago :-> Martyn Smith (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Gallagher

Alright Martyn! I didn't do much to Bernie's page just tried to put a positive spin on it with mentioning how he was in the side that got promoted.

Make sure you pop into the Bartons after any home game mate, I'm always there (usually drowning my sorrows and whinging!). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Villafancd (talk • contribs) 21:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited American Pie (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killing Me Softly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hurry Up and Wait (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mini-Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DPL, I'm terrible for not checking ambiguities. Late New Year's Resolution perhaps...:-> Martyn Smith (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Davy Jones (actor)

Hello, Martyn Smith. You have new messages at Mattgirling's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1931 FA Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beat the Nation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beat the Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat the Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 20:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicholas Padfield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Padfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Padfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 20:47, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Martyn Smith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heroes and Villains (football fanzine)

The article Heroes and Villains (football fanzine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fanzine, no reliable or third party sources, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Martyn Smith. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: https://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_4IOZ9axicW2sREx&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Martyn Smith. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Alan_Freeman Martyn Smith (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Shearer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Shearer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Shearer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]