User talk:Martin acero the iron man

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! nsaum75 ^{!Dígame¡‎} 05:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Western world

Please don't mark major edits such as [1] as minor.Please also provide edit summaries explaining your edits, where applicable. Deleting major portions certainly requires an explanation William M. Connolley (talk) 11:17, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Greece, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 17:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Western world. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Greece shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TERIKATA. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martin acero the iron man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We are brother and sister that use one computer, but different accounts. This account is mine, and my sister use the account TERIKATA. Please, unblock our both accounts, because we are two different persons with two different accounts, not one person, wich use two accounts (socket). Thank you very much in advance ! ! !

Decline reason:

The edits you and your sister have made, including your unblock requests are nearly identical. So similar, in fact, that I find your explanation very difficult to believe. —DoRD (talk) 02:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unlock

{{unblock|We purposely made our explications identical, because we want our both accounts to be unlocked, not only mine account or the account of my sister.}}

Please, unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martin acero the iron man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So that, @DoRD, you don't have reason not to beleave us. That we used purposely identical explanations doesn't mean that we aren't two different persons, right ! ? !

Decline reason:

This account was clearly created to support User:TERIKATA in edit warring. This is not allowed. If you do this again the original account will be blocked as well. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I didn't want to use my account for edit war

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martin acero the iron man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@jpgordon, I supported my sister, but I didn't created my account for edit war and I didn't want to create edit war. I just didn't knew that editing from one IP address will be considered as editing war, because despite that me and my sister editing from one IP address, we still are two different persons with two different opinions, which in the case with the article Western world coincident. So, please, unblock my account, because I didn't created it for edit war, and didn't want to use it for edit war.

Decline reason:

You didn't create it for edit war? Then why your first edit was to continue edit war started by your sister? Anyway, I don't care if this account is a sock or a different person as you claim - even in latter case it's a meatpuppet and should remain blocked. Max Semenik (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I said I didn't want to use my account for edit war

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Martin acero the iron man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Max Semenik, I just wanted to edit an article, I didn't knew that before that my sister edited it, not to mention that she started an edit war. That's why I want you to unblock my account. And why you think my account is a meatpuppet, when I'm the only one who edit articles from my account?

Decline reason:

The Chewbacca defense won't work. We think you're a meatpuppet because, after you make this revert, your sister makes the same exact one 45 minutes later. A bit too neat of a coincidence, eh? Well, that's all folks; talk page access from this account is hereby revoked as your narrative has grown tiresome. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.