User talk:Martin.treiber

S-Cube

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of S-Cube, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.s-cube-network.eu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further comment on S-Cube.

We don't keep articles on organizations, bodies, companies, or individuals, unless they have evidence of being "notable". (In line with the notion that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an accumulation of "facts about anything").

Could you add to the article talk page (Talk:S-Cube), some citations by third party reliable sources, official bodies, well reputed media, and the like, to demonstrate whether or not S-Cube has in fact been the subject of third party independent consideration (to the point it would be considered notable for Wikipedia)?

Quick further guidance on this: Wikipedia:Notability.

Thanks, FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 22:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of S-Cube

The article S-Cube has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ephemeral project. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 12:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]