User talk:Marmorto

Welcome!

Hello, Marmorto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Qwyrxian (talk) 00:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a forum--Christopher Columbus

Hi, I don't know if you saw my comment under yours on Talk:Christorpher Columbus, but the information you're adding there is not appropriate. Per WP:NOTFORUM, talk pages of articles are not a place to discuss the subject of the article itself. That is, you cannot use that talk page to debate the evidence for or against various historical aspects of Columbus, nor may you use it to evaluate the academic quality of various theories. Instead, its only use is to discuss changes to the article itself. This page in particular has a history of problems on this issue, and, as such, we tend to take it very seriously. Continuing to soapbox about different Columbus theories is a form of disruptive editing, and is not allowed. If you have something specific that you think should be added or changed in the article, feel free to discuss that, but you may not use this as a cite for academic debate. Thank you. 00:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Clarification based on the last sentence of your last post: you are correct that debate is important in social sciences. You are incorrect in thinking that that has anything to do with Wikipedia, because we aren't doing social science here. All we are doing is reporting what other social scientists have already said; we explain reliable sources have said, and make sure that our article represents the real world arguments in approximate weight to how much those beliefs are held in the real world. Wikipedia is explicitly, by one of our core policies, not a place to conduct original research. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]