User talk:Markeilz

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Robert Athlyi Rogers, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Conrado Villegas. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The article was deleted as possible original research, for lacking content and for lack of verifiable third-party references. Sorry, but a couple of sentences with no backing generally falls under the heading of speedy deletion. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 09:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

WP:OVERLINK is a policy I would suggest you read and digest. Regards, Justin the Evil Scotsman talk 08:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rahim Jaffer

Please see WP:NPOV. Even with a source, it's never appropriate or acceptable for the very first sentence of a Wikipedia article to describe the topic as "a disgraced former Member of Parliament" rather than just "a former Member of Parliament". Bearcat (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your edit originally, but you did revert it back into the article after somebody else removed it. Just so you know, anyway. Bearcat (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ya sorry, now i see what I did. I just saw the reference taken out and reverted. My bad.Markeilz (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. No worries, silliness happens sometimes :-) Bearcat (talk) 17:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I've put semi-protection (no anonymous editing) on the article for a one-week period; in addition to all the unsourced crap around his current controversies, there's also some wingnut trying to use his article to make broad pronouncements about whether Ismailis are real Muslims or crazy heretics. Ah, Wikipedia, the 21st century's answer to Speakers' Corner. Bearcat (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Maza Márquez

The article Miguel Maza Márquez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 05:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fitz Balintine Pettersburg

The article Fitz Balintine Pettersburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subject as no RS to support notability can be found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]