User talk:Markbcm

Welcome, Markbcm!

Hello, Markbcm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Jeffrey Mall just one of the 48,470,961 editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links I hope you will find useful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} exactly as it is written here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer any questions you may have. Again, welcome!

Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Fleur Revell

Hello Markbcm, this message is to let you know that this redirect page that you created as the result of a page move has been tagged for speedy deletion as an implausible redirect. If you have any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page. Reagrds, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict over Fleur Revell

Hi, Mark. I see you've had some trouble lately over this article. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, and I don't doubt in the least that your intentions are good, but no one is using the talk page to try to work out the dispute. It's quite clear that all parties are in violation of our policies against edit warring. If you feel there's damaging information being added to the article without reliable, verifiable sources to support that, it would be appropriate to post a complaint to the biographies of living persons notice board. If you don't do that, please try to work out the dispute amicably on the article's talk/discussion page; failing to do that, and just continuing to revert changes puts you at risk for sanctions for edit warring. I mean no disrespect, of course, I just felt you should be informed of this information in case you weren't already aware of it. I've put an identical notice on the other party's talk page, as well. Best, – OhioStandard (talk) 01:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Greg Broadmor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

We'll have the full story... at 11! 19:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Fleur Revell.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fleur Revell.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GreenCloud Virtual Printer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GreenCloud Virtual Printer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenCloud Virtual Printer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philipp Haas

Hello, Markbcm,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mdriscoll03 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Philipp Haas, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mdriscoll03}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mdriscoll03 (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdriscoll03: Hi Mdriscoll03, thank you for your message it is very nice to meet you as well :) I am relatively new to Wikipedia so I do appreciate the support. With respect to your suggestion regarding references, I had included 8 references in the article, were they not correct laid out? Please advise what steps need to be taken to remedy that, as I may have made a mistake on adding those - thank you! Markbcm (talk) 06:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Markbcm: I actually removed the proposal for deletion on the article however, I mistakenly forgot to remove the deletion proposal off of your talk page. Your article is no-longer up for deletion. Thank you and apologies, Mdriscoll03 (talk) 15:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdriscoll03: thank you Mdriscoll03 , I am most grateful for your support and updates :) Markbcm (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deva Holding A.S.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deva Holding A.S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:NXP, from its old location at User:Markbcm/sandbox/NXP National Express Products. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NXP (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references look like either press releases or trivial reporting

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NXP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NXP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Markbcm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 00:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NXP (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

The submitter has removed the trivial reporting and passing mentions; but removing trivial reporting and passing mentions does not add substantive content. This draft still does not speak for itself in establishing corporate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NXP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NXP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NXP

Hello, Markbcm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NXP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NXP

Hello, Markbcm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NXP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philipp Haas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philipp Haas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philipp Haas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ynsfial (talk) 07:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fleur Revell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fleur Revell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleur Revell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ynsfial (talk) 08:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]