User talk:Mark.s.parker

This is Mark.s.parker's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Ortmeyer (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Sarah Ortmeyer, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not create multiple copies of drafts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mark.s.parker/sandbox/Sarah Ortmeyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mark.s.parker/sandbox/Sarah Ortmeyer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark.s.parker! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Ortmeyer (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Ortmeyer (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Username Needed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are either IMDB-like listings or people who are known by the subject. There seem to be plenty of sources, but those sources do not seem to be significant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

^{[Username Needed]} 11:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of clarification on my concerns with sources I think is justified:

Sources 1-3, 5, 7-13 and 15-25 are simply listings of exhibitions or pages on IMDB-like websites.

4 is simply the record of graduation. Anyone who graduates has one of those, making it run-of-the-mill.

6 does not link to anywhere, so I cannot check it's reliability, however looks like shaky reliability/independence

14 is from a person who knows her, making the independence once again shaky.

^{[Username Needed]} 11:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sarah Ortmeyer

Hello, Mark.s.parker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarah Ortmeyer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Mjs1991 (talk) 12:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]