Jump to content

User talk:Marilen.buenviaje

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Marilen.buenviaje, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Antonio Helio de Castro Neto, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S Philbrick(Talk) 11:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Antonio Helio de Castro Neto

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Antonio Helio de Castro Neto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://nanocon2018.tanger.cz/en/profile/439p-prof-dr-antonio-h-castro-neto/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 11:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio H. Castro Neto (February 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Family and education in particular is completely missing inline citations. Also, make sure other inline citations are formatted properly
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Marilen.buenviaje! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio H. Castro Neto (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
He is unquestionably notable as a AAAS fellow, but this is a promotional web page for him, not an encyclopedia article. The articles should be about him, not CA2DM . It should include his major accomplishments and omit minor material. The infobox should include only the 2 or 3 most important awards.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio H. Castro Neto (February 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Marilen.buenviaje. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Marilen.buenviaje. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Marilen.buenviaje|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 12:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Praxidicae , I have sent you a message on your talk page. Also, I added the declaration on my userpage, https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Marilen.buenviaje Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonio H. Castro Neto has been accepted

[edit]
Antonio H. Castro Neto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Castro Neto

[edit]

I had been following the Castro Neto draft since we first discussed it on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help and see that it was finally accepted. Congratulations. However, you have a connection, even if not a PAID one, and should refrain from editing the article directly. You should be using the {{edit request}} template on the talk page from now on. Plus, you should declare your connection on your talk page. You can just put in a statement in your own words, it does not necessarily have to be a template like {{Userbox COI}}.

I replaced the advert tag on the article that you removed. To me, there are several passages of the article that still read as promotional - in particular the quote of Castro Neto's mission statement near the end. We'll see if other editors tone these down and then there can be a discussion on the talk page of whether the tag can be removed - removed by someone other than you. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 17:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

jmcgnh the motto and some phrases has already been removed. Can you please check if the advert tagging can now be removed? As for the COI, I am not paid, so the tagging is unfair and incorrect. I am okay to declare, but not using the "paid tagging". Do you mean I can just write a statement on my talk page and declare it, and that will do it? Thank you.Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The place for the disclosure is on your own user page, which you haven't created yet (which is why your name appears in red in your signature currently). Click on that and create the page with your explanation.

I see that some editing has been done to try to address the advert tag. The place to discuss that is on the article's talk page. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 08:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

jmcgnh I also replied to the article's talk page regarding the advert. Kindly check when you have time. Thank youMarilen.buenviaje (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


COI

[edit]

Please review the coi tagging placed on my article Antonio H. Castro Neto. I am not paid. I have made a declaration on my User page User:marilen.buenviaje. Thank you.Marilen.buenviaje (talk) 04:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marilen.buenviaje&oldid=1043827733"