User talk:Mariamoo333/Into the Forest

Hi Mariam,

Shooting you a quick message here because Prof. H wanted everyone who has received peer reviews and made revisions following those peer reviews to be provided with a "greenlight" to move their work out of the article draft sandbox and into their live Wikipedia article... So you can consider this your "greenlight," but ultimately I knew you've been making edits to your the live Into the Forest article throughout your drafting process, so I knew you were fine already! And I also know you've made edits since receiving your peer review from Naudika, so that's good too. Just thought I'd offer you some additional feedback, while I'm sending you a message anyway!

I see your article has been coming along, and you've refined the "Plot" section, and added some details to the "Production" section as well. I checked your links and sources, and they all seem to work fine. I especially think Time and Toronto Film Review were good choices to use.

I do agree with Naudika and Hunter, that everything you added seems excellent, but you could probably benefit from adding a little bit more content, if you have time. If you decide you want to do so, I'd probably recommend expanding the "Lead," "Cast," or "Reception" sections, since they seem to have the most room for improvement.

For cast, you could find a film review or a "behind-the-scenes" type article from a reputable source that describes the characters in detail, and give brief, one sentence descriptions of each character in the Wikipedia article. Or for reception, maybe you could find a couple film reviews from prominent film critics and summarize their reviews of Into the Forest into a few sentences to sort of "represent" the wider reception. I noticed the Rotten Tomatoes details in the "Reception" section are out of date as well, maybe you could update that too, if you decide to work on the "Reception" section at all.

Let me know if I can help out with anything! --Sjnickerson (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)