User talk:Maria964

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maria964 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet. I am not deceiving or misleading other editors, disrupting discussions. I am not affiliated to the Indiggo Twins, I do not know them personally, I have just followed their media pages and I am a great fan and admirer of their art. I have been working hard to gather up information on Mihaela's novel and I do not know why you deleted my intervention. Have you even verified the info? I have noticed in the history of the talk pages that you deleted anyone who had further good information to give on the Indiggo Twins. There is nothing illegitimate in wanting to improve a page. Thank you, Maria Maria964 (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

With all due respect to Anthony Bradbury I do not think we need to wait for the answer to that question before assessing this unblock request. I cannot imagine any explanation that would lead us to believe that User:Maria964 and User:Mariaesc964 are unrelated while both are showing interest only in the same single topic. Huon (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your relation to Mariaesc964? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Yes, I realized that; I was interested to see what answer was proffered; it might has been useful in case of further unblock requests. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Huon (talk) Anthony Bradbury Dear users, I am flabbergasted. I do not get why you have blocked me here. Yes, I am both users Maria esc and Maria 964, but I am not a sock puppet. How could you call me that? On what basis? You are still avoiding my question. I want to improve the page and you have not taken into account any of my edits. You simply deleted them. Should I respond to your "deletion" by blocking you, or should we talk like mature individuals who have the goal of improving pages and being nice to human beings who are spending their time and making genuine efforts in improving pages? If you think that I have not edited something appropriately, teach me or do it yourself. But just do not delete information and block people like that, because it seems ill-willed against anyone who has good words about the twins' further artistic work.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]