Jump to content

User talk:MargaretRDonald/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 15

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MargaretRDonald (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web hought this computer some time ago but have not used it..)ost. My IP address is 50.7.142.180. I have requested info from the anti-virus provider (Avast)which I think may have turned off the visibility of my IP address MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We can't undo these blocks this way. But I can commend your attention to WP:IPECPROXY where you can follow the instructions to request IP block exemption. I think you've got enough of an edit history to remove any doubts. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appealkey:be62e349bc6c9241d1fd34759600e99b MargaretRDonald (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #498

Wikidata weekly summary #499

Wikidata weekly summary #500

January 2022 with Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Cite Q

When you use {{Cite Q}}, you need to ensure that the citation style remains consistent with the original. At Arbanitis, for example, the style for the authors was "LAST, FIRST/INITIALS", and this should be maintained. I do agree that the "et al." needs expanding, but this should be done by over-riding the Wikidata formatting of the authors' names. I personally think this is always required; how else can we ensure consistency? Peter coxhead (talk) 10:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Peter coxhead, Thanks, Peter. Consistency is good. However, when subsequent authors are excluded (using options available in Cite Q), one loses the automatic linking to author (which happens when an author string is converted to an author and when someone writes an article about the author). I like the subsequent linking of authors directly to their work which comes about automatically when using cite Q. When you suppress the multiple authors (far prettier) you lose the automatic linking when someone later does an author disambiguation or writes an article for the author. When there is a pre-existing article for an author, then one can use the authorlink parameter. However, when no article has been written for an author there is no way that someone "correcting" the cite Q can automatically ensure linkage. Thus, for me consistency comes at a terrible cost to Wikipedia. MargaretRDonald (talk) 05:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't at all suggest suppressing all the authors; I never do this. What is needed at present, in every case in my view, is to explicitly include all the author names within the use of {{Cite Q}} to ensure that the style always remains consistent with the article's existing style, regardless of what happens at Wikidata. Ideally, as has been discussed before, there needs to be some way within {{Cite Q}} to force a particular author/editor name style, in a similar way in which templates like {{Use dmy dates}} force the citation templates to use a particular style for dates. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Peter coxhead, However it is not about suppressing author names. The reversion you made in Arbanitis meant that Graham Wishart and Rowell will not pop up as author links when articles for these authors are written, without someone going explicitly to Arbanitis and making an edit to create an author link. (As do the changes I made after your reversion). It is this capacity for the future links that makes me desire to use cite Q. If in article is close to FA, then I would probably probably agree with you on the issue of consistency. (And I agree with you. It would be great if wikimedia put some more money into the development of cite Q to deal with this issue.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #501

Wikidata weekly summary #502

You're invited! January 29: COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States Edit-a-thon / Translate-a-thon - Online via Zoom

COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States Edit-a-thon / Translate-a-thon (January 29, 2022)

Hello MargaretRDonald! I'd like to invite you to an Edit-a-thon / Translate-a-thon, open to the public, via Zoom on Saturday - January 29th, 2022, 1pm-3pm E.S.T. We will be focusing our edits on the ongoing Coronavirus pandemic. Click the event page to read more. This event is hosted by Sure We Can, a recycling and community center in Brooklyn. This is the 4th Covid-focused Edit-a-thon that Sure We Can has hosted. Click here to see the last three COVID-19 focused edit-a-thons: Sept 6th, 2020 & Nov 21, 2020 & Feb 6th, 2021. In past events, we translated the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into Yoruba, Malagasy, Hebrew, Swahili, Tagalog, Korean, Russian, Japanese, Portuguese, Polish, Greek, Haitian Creole, and wrote the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States article. We would love for you to join us. All experience levels welcome.

COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States Edit-a-thon / Translate-a-thon

Saturday January 29, 1PM - 3PM E.S.T (18:00 - 20:00 UTC)

--Wil540 art (talk) 19:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #503

Wikidata weekly summary #504

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #505

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

  • 1Lib1Ref 2022
  • Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #506