User talk:Marfan8

Image tagging for Image:Pshevorsk1gif.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pshevorsk1gif.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Photo4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Photo4.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Rabbi rakow.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rabbi rakow.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rabbi rakow.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rabbi rakow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bezalel Rakow.JPG

Where is this image from? Chesdovi 11:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Dawkins

The inclusion of this section is being discussed on the talk page of the article. Please participate in the discussion rather than re-adding the section against consensus. Thanks!! Gscshoyru 04:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy on Richard Dawkins

Can you please explain why you keep on removing the Controversy section of Antisemitism of Richard Dawkins. This is not properly discussed on the talk section and no real reason is given for its removal. The section is based on an unbiased, factual and unemotive event.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marfan8 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is being discussed, see Talk:Richard_Dawkins#Controversy_section. Though it looks like the discussion has ended with consensus against the addition, so please stop adding it until consensus is for the addition, ok? You're welcome to comment and re-start the discussion, of course. Gscshoyru 04:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied

Replied on my talk page. Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 23:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tumbalalaika

The problem with an 'artistic' translation is that it's not encyclopedia and constitutes original research, and is therefore against Wikipedia policies. The purpose of Wikipedia articles is to be encyclopedic and display encyclopedic content. Your translation is not completely out of place on MediaWiki projects however, and can probably be put into WikiSource. -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 13:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goyband

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Goyband, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Goyband. KrakatoaKatie 06:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabbi rakow.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rabbi rakow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 00:19, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bezalel Rakow.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bezalel Rakow.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 23:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]