User talk:MardiGrasCantab

Welcome!

Hi MardiGrasCantab! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But

but you can't just repurpose an article to become something else. If an article gets too long (which the Marshalls article hasn't) then it can be split, but there is a proper way to do it: WP:SPLIT. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

I have no idea whether or not your interest in the Marshall Group is just because it is a major business in your local area. But just in case may I draw your attention to policies Wikipedia:conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

My remark requires a quid pro quo declaration: I have no interests financial or otherwise in the Marshall Group or any of its subsidiaries. I watch the article because of the possibility that Marshall Aerospace will move to Cranfield Airport, near where I live. I have no interests in Cranfield Airport or Cranfield University. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC) updated to add CU. --10:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for flagging that. I am new to this - so your steer is very helpful. I do have a connection to Marshall but am not being paid to do this. It is a personal passion project. I have added that I have a connection to Marshall on my personal profile. I hope I've done this correctly. MardiGrasCantab (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did the right thing but in the wrong place. You need to put that flag in talk:Marshall Aerospace and Defence Group and talk:Marshall of Cambridge . On your personal page, you could just write exactly what you have said above: I do have a connection to Marshall but am not being paid to do this. It is a personal passion project. Or something like that, you can do what you like really apart from use it as a free website for your consultancy/plumbing business/whatever

--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously I didn't explain properly. You need to put the formal notice of interest notice in the talk pages of the articles you are editing. The informal version goes on your own user page. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and citations

As most new editors do, you have misunderstood "minor". It means grammar or spelling corrections that have no effect on the meaning of the article. The size is irrelevant: a change from "now" to "not" is jus one letter but certainly not minor. See WP:MINOR.

Can you also look at WP:citing sources (which is very long so for now you just need to read template:cite news and template:cite web. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

I'm not sure why you haven't been informed but I see from the history of the Marshall of Cambridge article that most of what you added has been expunged as copyright violation. You must not copy or close paraphrase external sources. See WP:COPYRIGHT. This is a serious matter and, if repeated, could well lead to your right to edit being removed. Please be more careful. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what was flagged as a copyright violation, or what has been removed, but from my perspective, the Marshall of Cambridge page is identical to the version I have written on a Word document on my computer - so nothing I added appears to been expunged. MardiGrasCantab (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odd... The copyvio edit note suggests that you copied it (or closely paraphrased it) from https://marshallfleetsolutions.co.uk/

@Bensci54:, can you elaborate ? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was a portion of the Marshall Fleet Solutions section that appeared to be lifted directly from their website. I removed it and applied for revdel. I don't recall exactly what from the website was copied, though, but it doesn't appear to have been re-added. Bensci54 (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a string of six (technical) words sourced from a different news website (referenced as the source) - the wording of which had originated from a Marshall Fleet Solutions' press release (and which also featured on the Fleet Solutions website). Legally, press releases are free of any intellectual property claims; this principle has been confirmed in both the US and UK. So am I not sure why this a) merited a copyright violation notice and b) if you don't accept the legal arguments in this case, why was the whole history of edits expunged for a few problematic words? I am new to Wikipedia - but that felt like a disproportionate response - and one that discourages people from making contributions. MardiGrasCantab (talk) 12:11, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall of Cambridge moved to draftspace

As you have declared a conflict of interest with the subject of Marshall of Cambridge, you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marshall of Cambridge (Holdings) Limited Logo 2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marshall of Cambridge (Holdings) Limited Logo 2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marshall of Cambridge moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marshall of Cambridge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have declared a COI in this subject, therefore you should not be moving this draft into the main article space past the AfC review. I have moved it back to drafts and submitted it for review. Kindly wait for that process to complete. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marshall of Cambridge (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marshall of Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marshall of Cambridge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MardiGrasCantab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]