Jump to content

User talk:Marcusmax/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7→Archive 9

Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)

Hi Marcusmax,

Thanks for promoting this article to Aviation A Class. Its currently undergoing an FAC class review for WP:MIL. Can I request you to please let me know what it might be lacking to get an FAC ?

On a side note, Speaking of your long term projects, Chicago O'hare International airport happens to have O'hare wildcat on display. Or may be a replica. I'd love to see some pictures of it in the article. If you have any, would you be so kind to upload it ?

Happy new year ! Thanks Perseus71 (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. Its appreciated. I am trying to incorporate their feedback as soon as It comes but its agonizing! Thankfully the A review for WP:AVIATION went quickly. I was afraid that B might have been held against the FA. Thanks all the same. As to the wildcat, I have seen its pictures in other places but those were not PD. I will try to get one if I ever pass through. Perseus71 (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Tyrone Willingham

Hi: I'm not conversant with the wiki, so here's my explanation on my reversion. Actually, Tyrone Willingham did not blame the smaller than usual recruiting classes for his loss to WSU. Two events got mixed up. There were two separate icidents where TW was asked why. One incident was after the WSU loss, the other was about his tenure at UW. My addition was regarding the second interview when he was asked about his record at UW and he said look at what he inherited when he came. It was therefore ironic because he left it worse than he came. And his explanation said nothing about recruiting classes. To say what is said now would not be correct and would not be factual. I can leave off the "ironic" comment, which is purely my own, but the fact remains that when asked about the low win/loss record, he blamed the situation that he inherited and that is purely factual. Thank you for listening.

Sorry, I don't know how to leave a message to you as you did to me.

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost
ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost
From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts bot

It has not run for some time according to its log. I'll inquire about it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

At the bottom of User talk:B. Wolterding/Article alerts there is an explanation.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

TFD

Clearing, Chicago is not using a template. It is a longhand infobox as I understand it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I have updated my commentary. I do not think the longhand boxes are an issue. They can be left alone without harm. Gradually people can convert them. The problem is the pages that are using a template that they want to delete. We have to take care of those pages before deletion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:34, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Testing features I haven't used yet.

I believe you left me a message about signing my Talk entries. Yes? (Will do so, by the way). Kernel.package (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Marcusmax. You have new messages at The ed17's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 00:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Hugh E. Rodham

May I ask why you added the {{cleanup}} tag to Hugh E. Rodham? The article looks generally okay to me. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

For an article this short and whose content is chronologically intertwined, I typically just add one "Biography" section, as I've done now. Is that sufficient to take the tag off? Wasted Time R (talk) 22:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenfields School

I replied to your comment at the AfD. Cirt (talk) 13:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I have actually been thinking a lot about this AfD, I have read the arguments provided by you and others and at this time I have decided to change my opinion. I noticed that JJL injected Wikipedia:SCHOOL#Indicators_of_probable_notability, however this is not a policy of wikipedia, rather a failed proposal for a new sub policy of WP:N. And to answer your actual question, no I cannot find any reliable third party sources, and since I hate school articles anyway i guess I will change my opinion. -Marcusmax(speak) 22:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah okay that sounds reasonable. Cirt (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Apologies to trouble you, but just to let you know, after you changed to delete, JJL (talk · contribs) was good enough to present secondary sources on the AfD discussion page. I have changed myself to Keep. Cirt (talk) 11:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marcusmax/Archive_5&oldid=1141853330"