User talk:Marco12345678910111213141516171819202122232425

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marco12345678910111213141516171819202122232425 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Marco12345678910111213141516171819202122232425 (talk) 21:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry, vandalism, yeah this is not a good unblock request. Please read the guide to appealing blocks. And please appeal on your original account, not this one. You should also disclose all the accounts that you have. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am interested with Wikipedia, I was just messing around on Bytey's talk page. Which I had permission to do, I have another account named Marco502p which has no history of vandalism and is new.

Can you link me where on-wiki you were given permission to vandalize, and which admin gave this permission? SQL^{Query me!} 21:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

What can you tell me about the account Marco1234567891011121314151617181920? Are you familiar with our policies regarding sockpuppetry? SQL^{Query me!} 21:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

For those watching RFU, User_talk:Bytey#Sockpuppetry is relevant as well. SQL^{Query me!} 21:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)