User talk:Marchesa
|
July 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Curtis Organ has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfacebook\.com (links: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=38487986787).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I removed the section of this article that appears to be copied from: http://www.lyrichord.com/linernotes/LYRCD6008US.pdf. Unless this is a "reverse copyvio" (text that appeard on wikipedia first) it can't stay in the entry. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 17:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- It seems that you refuse to read the verification and the copyright statement that Vox Ama Deus owns the copyright, and therefore we have the right to post it, including posting it on Wikipedia if we choose. Kindly identify yourself. Paul Marchesano Marchesa (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]
In general, a person or organization added to a list, as on Cameron (surname), should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability policy. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have and had read the notability requirements, and thought that providing the references was sufficient to establish, along with his documented credentials, that the person I added to the list of notable Camerons qualified. Please correct me if I am not understanding the language of the Notability page. The person (Charles) I added is not the only one on the list who does not have an article on Wikipedia. A simple of search of articles still available online in teh New England Journal of Medicine as well as other recognized medical journals can be appended, if you so desire. Marchesa (talk) 22:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
edits to Valentin Radu
[edit]First of all, please do not call good faith edits vandalism, I am not the first person to remove this contribution to the entry. Now, if you are claiming that you own the copyright to the text that you are adding to the entry, please follow the appropriate procedure, which you can find here: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. It is never sufficient to simply say that you own the copyright, since anyone can do that. Please note also any text still has to be encyclopedic and not promotional. Also note the conflict of interest guidelines. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 23:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, deleting the content of a page is not within the guidelines you reference. All the guidelines were in fact met, except for the permissions email, which is not required, but I have now done. There are no undocumented claims in the article. Your "editing" is in violation of the description given on the permissions page:
"Please be aware that the content you donate is subject to continuous editing by the Wikipedia community. It may be added to, subtracted from, rearranged, illustrated, split into multiple articles, translated into other languages, and otherwise changed beyond your expectations."
- I do not see anything in the copyright guidelines that says content will be arbitrarily deleted. Once again, as I have done, I ask you to identify yourself and why this particular page is of such interest to you. 173.59.34.106 (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have verified the permission email you sent, so this particular situation is resolved. I feel that I must point out, however, that removing content copied from elsewhere unless it has been verified to be either freely licensed (e.g., via the permissions email) or in the public domain is not only allowed but required by policy. Evidence of permission is required for any and all copyrighted material being imported into Wikipedia. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Marchesa! Your additions to Mikołaj Zieleński have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| (Talk) (Contributions) 16:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)