User talk:MapleTreeXZ

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Rocko's Modern Life episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Rocko's Modern Life episodes was changed by MapleTreeXZ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872548 on 2016-05-01T21:39:39+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Knowledgekid87. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Powerpuff Girls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information you are adding needs to be sourced by reliable websites. Please provide where you are getting your information from on the article's talk-page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jay Lender, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Paper and Life of Crime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ed, Edd n Eddy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Leighton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mickey Mouse (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ren & Stimpy cast and crew members

Hi, would you mind moving the list of Ren & Stimpy cast and crew members to List of The Ren & Stimpy Show cast and crew members, akin to the way The Simpsons and List of The Simpsons cast members are structured? Stuffing the infobox with dozens of names and tiny parenthetical text is not the best way to convey this information, and putting it in its own article would relieve the visual noise. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lazar Saric

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Lazar Saric requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 23:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox television

Hi there, re: this edit at Wabbit (TV series), though you obviously meant well, the |director= parameter of the infobox is not intended to document everybody who received a credit with "director" in the title. The person credited as a director of an episode is the appropriate name to include, not voice directors, or casting directors, or directors of accounting, etc. If you edit TV articles you should probably take a look at Template:Infobox television and MOS:TV to familiarize yourself with the sort of content the community is interested in. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, |executive_producer= is not meant for other types of producers.[1][2] Only executive producers should be included. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Time writers

I just wanted to explain my revisions. Per MOS:TV, only primary writers (i.e. storyboard artists) are supposed to be listed. Otherwise, the small infobox gets bloated with rather unnecessary info. However, the storyline writers can and should be listed on individual episode pages.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Since you're apparently not understanding what you've been told, infoboxes have limited space, meaning that only essential information should be included and fields should only be used for the purposes specified. Additional comments like "also animation director", "also recording director", "also supervising director", "also animation director", etc should not be included. As was recommended previously, please read the instructions for {{Infobox television}} and look through your previous edits to see what has been reverted, and why. --AussieLegend (✉) 06:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abra-Catastrophe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Boyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nate Cash

Hello, MapleTreeXZ. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nate Cash, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MapleTreeXZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Steve Borst) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Steve Borst, MapleTreeXZ!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article could use additional sources. Otherwise, nice start!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Steve Borst

The article Steve Borst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CREATIVE; no evidence of notability of this individual. Notability of individual shows he worked on such as Breadwinners is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi there, re: these changes, discussion forums are not suitable for use as references. Anyone on the internet can say whatever they want in a discussion forum. There's no presumption that the information is factual in any way. Please see our guidelines on user-generated content. Other examples of unsuitable user-generated sources: Unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, Wikia, and even Wikipedia itself. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Loud House episodes

You've edited here long enough to know what is and is not reliably sourced. Please don't re-add content that is unsourced like you did here. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of The Loud House episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MapleTreeXZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trey Parker

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with your edits to Trey Parker. As I'm sure you must know by now, Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires material in to be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation. While the article's Personal life section did previously mention dates of Parker's marriages , I looked through the citations given at the end of that passage, and as I indicated in my edit summary, none of them mentioned any dates or years. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Snoop Dogg. Rob van vee 08:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I don't believe I should be blocked for my latest post on Michael Lohan Jr. because I included IMDb in the external links for information on other pages, and never had this happen before. Some wikipedia page examples were from Lynne Naylor, Nate Cash, and William Reiss. If Michael Lohan Jr. isn't the reason, please let me know the real reason why I was blocked. That way, I can know what I did wrong. Yes, Robvanvee warned me that I'd be blocked without further notice for adding unsourced material. But, letting me know directly what I did wrong is important so I can have my saying on the matter, whether I'm right in my response or not.}}

. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of IMDB as Wikipedia reference

I saw your note to Ronhjones' talk page. IMDB is crowd-sourced, meaning it is written by amateurs who are often fans of one thing or another. Use of IMDB as a ref is almost always the result of a keyword-search. Blogs, message boards, fanzines, Wordpress, etc are treated similarly. I have wanted for a few years to write a film-report article for an actress who is quite famous, but there are no adequate sources searchable (1983 film with another quite famous male co-star), which is probably why no-one else has managed to write a stand-alone article. It is included only into a filmology list as a black (unlinked) entry. Hope this helps.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:58, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an example of Wordpress, an amateur creation which is quoting (some of) exactly the (unique) words I wrote at Wikipedia just a few days ago - scroll to the bottom to see Wordpress. Wikipedia content is available, but they should make acknowledgement, which mostly does not happen. This is an example of a site that should not be used as a Wikipedia reference - I found it when keyword-searching for something else. Internet content is unregulated and there is no policing of plagiarism. Internet writers use Wikipedia as the hard work has often been done for them. From this 'about us' section, you can see it's three dudes who set themselves up in 2018. Good manners prevent me from stating what I normally call such webs()ites, but it has an additional 'h' in the spelling!--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I understand what you're saying.

October 2018

Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Malcolm Shabazz have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk.
Please read WP:NBSP and stop removing HTML you don't understand. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MapleTreeXZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries. It really helps us save a lot of time. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuck Tucker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuck Tucker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuck Tucker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]