User talk:ManyPosts

Welcome!

Hello, ManyPosts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jalen Folf (talk) 22:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wroetoshaw is now Draft:W2S

In the interest of keeping one draft for each subject, can you please work on the draft at W2S instead? Thanks! Jalen Folf (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But you just deleted the entire article. ManyPosts (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: W2S (January 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This was declined 6 times previously for notability not being established and I still don't think he fits the criteria, especially since the redirect is protected.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he is. There are plenty of articles suggesting that the subject in notable. Please take the time read the page properly, including the citations. The majority of reviewers just look at the previous declines and automatically make a decision. ManyPosts (talk) 13:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ManyPosts! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:W2S. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not continue to resubmit a rejected Draft. When a draft is rejected it cannot be resubmitted. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you will reported to Wikipedia if you continue to vandalise the page. I’ve already told you that the subject in notable and includes multiple verified articles. ManyPosts (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:VANDALISM to know what vandalism actually is. Also, your article was declined 6 times previously which tells me multiple other people agree that it is not notable, especially not notable enough to override a fully protected redirect which requires an administrator. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve just proven my point. Your decision is only based on the previous declines. This isn’t my article, I’ve only changed it and used verified citations, so the previous declines are invalid as I have done everything that was needed. Obviously you haven’t looked at the page properly like you should have done. as you are clearly inexperienced, please avoid that article again. And stop removing my submission. This is a last warning. Anymore vandalism will be reported and an investigation will go ahead. ManyPosts (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop accusing me of vandalism. Read WP:VANDALISM before continuing to accuse me of vandalism. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This reply is to notify you that you have been reported and an investigation will begin shortly. ManyPosts (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean by that? SniperReverter (Talk to me) 17:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See their section on me at WP:ANI ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh I thought there was a impiled legal threat, dont mind me SniperReverter (Talk to me) 17:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a legal threat.

it is not even a threat. ManyPosts (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, it's not a threat because Blaze did nothing wrong which is how the AN/I is playing out. What you did was cast aspersions by trying to make what they did as a legitimate function of the review process (WP:AfC) out to be vandalism which it most certainly is not. Wikipedia's definition of vandalism is very specific. Doing a legitimate function is not one of those specifics regardless of whether the results of that function is correct or not. --ARose Wolf 17:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok yeah, I just saw "investigation" and jumped to conclusion, feel free to trout me. SniperReverter (Talk to me) 17:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 17:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also possible SPI, investigation in progress SniperReverter (Talk to me) 18:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]