This is an archive of past discussions with User:Manpoudar. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Gautama Buddha, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hindu calendar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
'''Hindu calendar''' (also called as [[Bikram Sambat]] is an official calendar era of [[Nepal]] and a collective name for
Hi Damakian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Itahari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I'm not sure that you should be using Twinkle to do reverts like this.
Did you not understand my edit summary of "Sadly, WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES applies: see this article's discussion page" when I removed the gallery of examples of ethnic Madhesis ?
Even if you did not bother to click on the blue hyperlink, I also drew your attention to the "article's discussion page" - where I had previously left this explanation:
Although it is common to use an appropriate representative image for the lead of an article—often in an infobox—allowing readers to quickly assess whether they are on the right page, WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES states clearly "Articles about ethnic groups or similarly large human populations should not be illustrated by a photomontage or gallery of images of group members"
I will, therefore, and sadly, remove the images of leading Madhesis from the infobox of this article.
I appreciate that selecting a replacement lead image may be difficult.
Advice on selecting a lead image includes "Lead images should be images that are natural and appropriate visual representations of the topic; they not only should be illustrating the topic specifically, but should also be the type of image that is used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works, and therefore what our readers will expect to see. Lead images are not required, and not having a lead image may be the best solution if there is no easy representation of the topic."
Another thing to note is that the "first image in an article, regardless of whether it is placed in the lead, will be enlarged and displayed at the top of all articles viewed in the Android mobile app. For example, if the first image in an article about Theft is a person, then that person's picture will be displayed as if it were the lead image, even if the image displays at the end of the article in the desktop view."
The effect of that is that, as I write this, the technically poor quality image of the Madheshi Martyrs who lost their lives, will be displaying right at the top of their screen for many smart phone readers.
That means that we urgently need to consider "whether the order of the images may inadvertently produce a non-neutral, unfair, or otherwise poor educational experience for readers who use mobile devices."
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhesi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madhesi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Your information is incorrect. Prince attended North High School in Minneapolis. Central High School is in St. Paul. Please correct this information. Minnesotamommy (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vedic period, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk!04:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Not reliable
The information provided on Vedic Period article is not reliable. That period was not only of India but also of Nepal which was never a part of India but is historically Hindu kingdom until 2007. Nepal civilization is fully a vedic civilization nation. And references was already given.. please revise the page to last time I edit if possible. Thank You.
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Gautama Buddha, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hindu calendar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
