User talk:Manofpeace87

What's poppin?

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Captain Hook has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Captain Hook was changed by Manofpeace87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956051 on 2014-12-08T19:32:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shooting of Tamir Rice. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 22:34, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at God's Not Dead (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: God's Not Dead (film) was changed by Manofpeace87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958321 on 2014-12-14T18:49:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jeb Bush has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jeb Bush was changed by Manofpeace87 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955908 on 2015-01-08T16:30:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 16:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Steve Kroft

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Steve Kroft), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manofpeace87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

um i didnt do anything

Decline reason:

Decidedly not true. No reason to unblock given. Huon (talk) 21:41, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manofpeace87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm confused. what do you think i did?

Decline reason:

Either vandalism or garbage edits; classify them as you see fit. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.