User talk:Manikprabhu68

January 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I am not sure why you have blocked me. I am experimenting writing on sand box. What is wrong with it. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manikprabhu68: VishalVithalKamat and Manikprabhu68 is not directly related for following reason: 1. VishalVithal Kamat is a different person and he used my PC ( as I am freelance writer known to him)but his account was already blocked few moths ago. Period.

Manikprabhu68 belongs to me , He requested me to write a piece on him. He is a famous hotelier in India. https://vishalkamat.com/

In my sandbox, Manikprabhu68, I wrote a piece for last two days, after going through your tutorials and tests. Is that wrong ? Otherwise, we are not connectee, your policies allow well referenced articles. Please unblock me. My only mistake is I used his ID :VishalVithalKamat to write article, but as that was blocked, it was not possible, In the process on 16th and 17th Jan, you blocked my IP address. So otherwise there is no violation or abuse. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 17:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me , Why I can not see Sandbox article

Please help. I am handicapped. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 16:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manikprabhu68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am just trying to learn writing article in Sandbox, I have not abused anything, I am just writing neutral piece on Vishal Vithal Kamat , famous hotelier in India. I dont think that is wrong, please check the blocked article, I have used outside sources to write the article. I do admit my IP address was used to work on multiple account that was becuase I was new to whole thing. So I worked on my self account Manikprabhu68, Please unblock me, I am not abusing anything. If your committee find my article bad, It can refuse the publication. I am not doing any harm to you or to your polices. I am handicapped so have broken fingers,please donot do this to me

Decline reason:

I don't know exactly what you mean by "directly" related to VishalVithalKamat, but if you mean that you have no connection to that account, then that is absurd, as will be glaringly obvious to any administrator who studies the history of the two accounts. If that is not what you mean, then you may like to explain what you do mean, and state clearly what the connection between the two accounts is. JBW (talk) 17:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have no way directly related to VishalVithalKamat. So please donot penalise me. Kindly lift the block. I want to see article written on Sandzone. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|...}} Manikprabhu68 (talk) 17:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manikprabhu68: VishalVithalKamat and Manikprabhu68 is not directly related for following reason: 1. VishalVithal Kamat is a different person and he used my PC ( as I am freelance writer known to him)but his account was already blocked few moths ago. Period.

Manikprabhu68 belongs to me , He requested me to write a piece on him. He is a famous hotelier in India. https://vishalkamat.com/

In my sandbox, Manikprabhu68, I wrote a piece for last two days, after going through your tutorials and tests. Is that wrong ? Otherwise, we are not connectee, your policies allow well referenced articles. Please unblock me. My only mistake is I used his ID :VishalVithalKamat to write article, but as that was blocked, it was not possible, In the process on 16th and 17th Jan, you blocked my IP address. So otherwise there is no violation or abuse.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manikprabhu68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Manikprabhu68: VishalVithalKamat and Manikprabhu68 is not directly related for following reason: 1. VishalVithal Kamat is a different person and he used my PC ( as I am freelance writer known to him)but his account was already blocked few moths ago. Period. Manikprabhu68 belongs to me , He requested me to write a piece on him. He is a famous hotelier in India. https://vishalkamat.com/ In my sandbox, Manikprabhu68, I wrote a piece for last two days, after going through your tutorials and tests. Is that wrong ? Otherwise, we are not connectee, your policies allow well referenced articles. Please unblock me. My only mistake is I used his ID :VishalVithalKamat to write article, but as that was blocked, it was not possible, In the process on 16th and 17th Jan, you blocked my IP address. So otherwise there is no violation or abuse.

Decline reason:

In that case, you are unambiguously violating WP:SOCK. It was deeply inappropriate of you to attempt to edit on behalf of a blocked editor. You will not be unblocked to do this. Yamla (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Spicy:

@JBW:

Request for unblocking

I have used following accounts to edit and write : Manikprabhu68 and VishalVithalKamat due to not knowing your policies of multiple account uses.

Accounts were used to write well informed balanced article on businessman of repute in India: Vishal Vithal Kamat

I thought article can be written using Vishal Vithal Kamat's page. However, that was already blocked months back.

This has caused confusion at your end as IP address used for both account access is mine: Manikprabhu68

I agree and acknowledge, What I did was wrong and not correct. I apologize.

I hereby admit my mistake and undertak not to do such things again, and to abide by all Wikipedia polices.

I also request you to undergo a period of mentorship or probation, with a more experienced editor advising me.

Please help out this time. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 01:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is far easier for other editors to follow conversations if the posts are in chronological order. I have therefore moved two of your recent posts to the bottom of this page, but earlier posts may still be out of order.
This is a CheckUser block, and since I am not a CheckUser I would not be able to unblock you even if I chose to, but I will give some of my thoughts relating to the possibility of an unblock. The administrator/CheckUser who blocked you, Spicy, has edited since you pinged him above, but has not responded to you, which may indicate that he has no wish to say anything, but I am mentioning him in case he would like to respond to my comments.
Thank you for at last being straightforward about your use of two accounts. It would have been more helpful to have done so right from the start, but let's move on from there. Personally, I am willing to believe that you originally used someone else's account honestly not realising that doing so wasn't allowed, so I wouldn't hold that against you if I were able to consider unblocking you, but I find some other administrators are often less willing than I am to set things of that kind aside. There are also some other factors which may affect the likelihood of your being unblocked. One thing which you should do is look at the guideline on conflict of interest, if you haven't already done so, because it applies to your editing. I advise you to post a message here making it clear that you understand that guideline, and will comply with it.
What can you tell us about the account Aloylobo? JBW (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Aloylobo is an employee of VishalVithalKamat. All of their accounts are already blocked. I undertake never to access them and comply by conflict of interest guideline. I did access as said earlier Userid: VishalVithalKamat as well as Aloylobo, however both were blocked, So could not work in them or get trained in editing aspects on Wikipedia. Please forgive me.

I hope and request you all, I am a teacher myself, mistake is not deliberate and not to harm anyone.

I am grateful that you have looked at sympathetically at my error of judgement, I will not repeat the mistake again. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla

I have read conflict of interest guideline and will not repeat the online behavior violating your code. Please revoke the block.

@Spicy

I have looked at the guideline on conflict of interest, because it applies to my editing.I have understood that guideline, and will comply with it. I have no intention to do anything wrong. Please forgive for ignorance.

@Spicy I have apologized and read your conflict of interest] guideline. Please revoke the block.

@JBW

I have apologized and read your conflict of interest] guideline. Please revoke the block. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 12:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal to unblock @Deepfriedokra

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manikprabhu68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have inadvertently violated your conflict of interest guideline. I am new user. I undertake not to violate any of your codes in future. Please give me one chance to be a standard editor.

Decline reason:

Sharing a computer? Sounds like a WP:UPE ring. You are not a "standard editor," whatever that is. You are a PAID editor. Please read and be prepared to heed WP:PAID. Please read that carefully. You seem to playing dodgeball with the reasons for your block. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra

Subject: Appeal to Lift Block on Account (Username: [Manikprabhu68])

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account (Username: [Manikprabhu68]) for the following reasons:

Use of a Blocked User ID: VISHALVITHALKAMAT: I acknowledge and take full responsibility for attempting to edit content using the blocked User ID "VISHALVITHALKAMAT." This action was a result of my misunderstanding and the misguided belief that I needed to use this specific account to contribute an article about a company, as I was requested to do so by external parties.

I realize that this was an abuse of Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused by this action.

It is important to note that my intentions were to contribute positively to Wikipedia by providing information about the company. However, I now understand that my approach was incorrect and violated Wikipedia's guidelines. Failure to Disclose Paid Editing: I am also aware that I failed to disclose the paid nature of the article I was attempting to contribute. This was an oversight on my part, as I was not aware of the paid edit disclosure requirement, which is a necessary condition to edit Wikipedia articles.

I want to assure the Wikipedia community that I did not intend to breach any guidelines, and I am committed to adhering to the principles set forth by the Wikipedia Foundation.

Steps I Will Take Differently: In light of these circumstances, I commit to making the following changes to my approach:

I will refrain from using blocked User IDs or pages for editing purposes. I will use my legitimate Wikipedia account ([Manikprabhu68]) for all future contributions, ensuring that I adhere to the paid article disclosure and conflict of interest clauses outlined by the Wikipedia Foundation. I understand the importance of transparency and integrity within the Wikipedia community, and I am fully committed to upholding these principles moving forward.

Declaration: I hereby declare that I will comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including but not limited to the disclosure of paid editing and avoidance of the use of blocked User IDs.

I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing my appeal. If there are any additional steps or information required, please do not hesitate to let me know.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,

[Manikprabhu68]

Blocked

Confirmed spam sock, Bhidu. Manikprabhu68, we have no interest in your paid contributions. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Please note I have no way connected to any account Bhidu. I have made a mistake with regard to VishalVithalKamat , I have admitted the mistake. Please be reasonable in judging the matter.

Please explain how to write a paid article? I want to be paid writer for a company in India. They are a reputed listed company on Bombay Stock Exchange. Each time I tried my account was blocked, although I have repeatedly disclosed my lack of knowledge in first instance. Please provide me guideline such as who will approve topic, how you review the article. Is there any step by step guideline. I have an article ready with neutral stance with reputed references. Kindly help out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manikprabhu68 (talk • contribs)

Asked and answered already. We have no interest in your paid contributions. --Yamla (talk) 10:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have admitted my lack of knowledge about your processes. Kindly help to learn them, I once again appeal you as a physically challenged person to help me out. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What has being a "physically challenged person" to do with being blocked from editing Wikipedia? I don't see any connection. JBW (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am appealing to reconsider my block as I am now aware of your rules and regulations. I was only looking to learn and contribute on Wikipedia. Physically challenged need to given opportunities to learn the website and it's dynamics. I never meant to do wrong. Kindly consider. Manikprabhu68 (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]