User talk:Mandanmandrake

Sources

Re, your message, go have a read of WP:UNDUE, WP:V and WP:RS. WP:UNDUE applies to the undue weight given to a single dvd cover in an article about his entire film career, while WP:V and WP:RS applies to your 'sources', which name no author, no specific article, link to no specific article, etc. It is therefore unverifiable, and is not reliable as no author is named. Please stop adding it until it meets those last two requirements. And don't just straight up undue my edit, as you would be violating WP:UNDUE in restoring the dvd cover. This is an article about his entire film career. Not a single dvd.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 05:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We've had this discussion before, and it looks like per Mammooty's article, we're going to have it again. I told you to read our policy on sources before, but per your most recent edits, it looks like you haven't. The following is bold, as it is the relevant part of the policy you are violating: Forums are not reliable sources. Find a reliable source before re-adding the information again.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 07:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then link the blog, however, a magazine scan is two things: Still unreliable(it could be edited in an image editing program), and a copyright violation. We do not link to copyright violations. Again, do not use scans, or forums, as sources. Read our policy on reliable sources before contributing anymore, like I originally asked of you.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 08:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to be an expert to click links, like the several I originally supplied for you. You've had two-plus weeks to read them, claiming ignorance doesn't fly.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 08:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to be proficient to click a few links and read what's on the other side.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs 17:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]