User talk:Mancini

NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

Thanks for updating File:IPhone_OS_4_Logo.png. Is there anyway you would be able to centre the iOS logo a little bit more to the right because it just seems a little off-centre to me. 86.176.55.232 (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Subnetwork

Hi,

Here I put a link which I will explain about below: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Subnetwork#edit_id_91277922_abusive_edit part of your text: "and i was pointing out the history of subnets".

I think your idea about a history section for subnet or subnetmask is a good thing, because I was searching for subnet mask history, because I always thought that the subnet mask was some "invention" of microsoft, and that it was only for microsoft computers, and looking into a history section, I believe would have helped me understand why they "invented" the 'subnet mask'. Anyway I repeat: Good point about a history section in article. Logictheo 19:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. . I've warned you previously to comment on content not contributors, but it seems you were unable to resist with this edit summary[1].--Crossmr 17:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are strange , i shall ignore you from now on and submit my changes for that page to peer review on the talk page.--Mancini 17:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate your effort to remove the personal attacks, once you've made one in an edit summary, I believe only an administrator can remove it. The edit I referenced above was in regards to the way you worded the edit summary, you could have requested assistance without referring to me as unskilled. The point with WP:NPA is to keep your comments on the content of the article, i.e saying "I think that this material X should have been kept in the intro" instead of saying "Editor X is being abusive and censoring me and he's unskilled and his expertise is questioned". I'm sure that between the two of us we can be adults and write a proper article.--Crossmr 17:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like i said your behaviour is strange to me being so touchy , i do not have interest in personal attacks which is why i edited the summaries , my interest is in the wikipedia networking content --Mancini 17:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the past I've dealt with many editors who could not keep the discussion the article and felt the need to continually attack me and behave uncivily towards me. I was perhaps a bit hasty in thinking you might be going the same route, I apologize for misjudging you.--Crossmr 17:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Subnet.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Subnet.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (t) 04:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ethernet73.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ethernet73.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMPUTING Invitation

I have noticed that you are already a member of a related project and thought you might be interested in this wikiproject also and hence leaving this note ... - From the outreach dept

Please accept this invite to join the Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing.
Simply click here to accept! -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intergrated banner for WikiProject Computer networking

I have made a proposal for a intergrated banner for the project here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 11:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dilnarin Demirbag

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dilnarin Demirbag, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 02:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Paul Williams

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Billy Paul Williams, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.pearlicka.com/artists_billypaulwilliams.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Macosx audiovideo corevideo 20091030.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macosx audiovideo corevideo 20091030.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Macosx graphics coreanimation 20091030.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Macosx graphics coreanimation 20091030.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apple iOS

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Apple iOS has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 00:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've declined the speedy moving of iOS (Apple) because this is not necessarily uncontroversial (just look up on the talk page) and you have already listed it appropriately at WP:RM. You still need to list Category:iOS (Apple), though, as explained on the template.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Software distribution

A tag has been placed on Software distribution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fleet Command (talk) 11:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capture 7.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Capture 7.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Software distribution

The article Software distribution has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article only defines a term, and as such should be in a dictionary rather than an encyclopedia. Delete per WP:NOT#DICT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Apache2Triad

The article Apache2Triad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet another WAMP stack, and no third-party sources to establish notability. A web search turns up a couple of blogs, but not enough to satisfy WP:NSOFT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mancini. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Subnetting.gif

The file File:Subnetting.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused and unlikely to be used. Full disclosure, I redirected a draft currently using it, as it was already an article in mainspace and had been abandoned for a full decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]