User talk:Manasanyal

October 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manasanyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Today at noon I opend my account and did some editing . when I was going to open my account , unfortunately i putted wrong password by my mistake so that reason my IP address 117.194.36.108 has been blocked by SchuminWeb. It is my kind request to you please unblock my ip address 117.194.36.108 so then i can complete my urgent work. prabhati sanyal (talk) 13:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account was not blocked for a password error. Rather, your account has been blocked directly because you appear to have posted an article that was purely advertising or spam. Your IP is blocked as a result, so that you can't just log out and log back in with a different account to continue editing. In order to unblock your account, we need to know that you understand why the article you posted is unacceptable - and, following that, you will need to assure administrators that you can edit within our policies. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 14:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manasanyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I received your message, and understood where i did wrong.Such action has been happened by my very poor mistake. I really very apologies to you and i will delete every contains which represent advertising and promotion and ensure you such action will not be done again.This is my request to please unblock my ip 117.194.36.108 address and I can delete whole action which i didprabhati sanyal (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There may be some confusion here, for which I apologize - the article itself has already been deleted, and I can find no additional edits from this account or from the IP address you indicate. So there's nothing to undo, as far as that goes. Discussion here is about your future edits, and whether they will be disruptive or not. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manasanyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes Sir, I assure you , will not go beyond rules and regulation of Wikipedia. Because I know my ip address 117.194.36.108 has been detected as well as email id . If I will do repeat such action so you will take very strong action against me. So I am very careful on that matter particularly.prabhati sanyal (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unfortunately I have no reason to believe that you really know what you're doing wrong, or indeed that you will cease to do it. — Joseph Fox 13:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sir, I know, did very poor mistake, but can assure you for future edit such thing will not be happened further against your rules. Right now I can, ensure you for not doing anything which can abuse your regulations and request you to unblock my ip address 117.194.36.108, otherwise i have not any way.It was my first and last mistake. prabhati sanyal (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, you created your account on September 14th. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir, I created this account 14th September, purpose only to put valuable information about Tea, but unfortunately I had done very poor mistake which should not be done.I learnt from my such mistakes and never repeat it in future which can abuse your rules. prabhati sanyal (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, you don't need to post new {{unblock}} templates every time you respond. I've removed the extras and formatted the convo accordingly. No comment on the merits of the block or unblock (at the time of this comment). Kwsn (Ni!) 18:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you i will not go for such edit which can violate your policy.I will be very obliged if you consider my request to unblock my ip address and Kindly reply me. prabhati sanyal (talk)

Yet you ignored me saying you don't need to post {{unblock}} every time you reply. How are we supposed to know you've read the policy pages? Kwsn (Ni!) 18:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]