User talk:Man of Kvass

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Man of Kvass (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Help! I tried to edit a page on Wikipedia but for some odd reason my IP is blocked as it is linked to this account named "Entuziazm". I do not have any memory of creating this account and I have no idea as to how it is affiliated with my IP address. Man of Kvass (talk) 16:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Autoblock appears to be working correctly. PhilKnight (talk) 18:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Man of Kvass (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I found out why my IP is blocked. Turns out the account "Entuziazm" is the account of my 13-year old little brother who, from what I can see, made completely unnecessary and disruptive edits. However, he did know that the IP address on his computer is also linked to mine, so now I am banned from editing for something I did not do. May I please have this IP unbanned? I will try my very best to prevent my little brother from ever making those disruptive edits. I promise. Man of Kvass (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nah. The other account also claimed that someone else was using it. This account is now directly blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Man of Kvass (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know this guy in real life. He is at my school. When he said that his brother, "Entuziazm", was the one responsible for the disruptive edits and not him, he was telling the truth. You see, both he and his brother's IP addresses are the same, so banning the IP address is completely unfair and disrespectful as for my friend cannot edit due to something he was not responsible for (as stated before, he literally made no disruptive edits). He is not a sockpuppet of his brother's account. Another thing to mention is that do you remember Man of Kvass creating any serious conflicts when he made this account? Do you? Look at his contributions other than his talk page (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Man_of_Kvass) and tell me if he started any issues. As his friend, I kindly ask you to unban him as for he did nothing wrong and what he said about "having alternative IPs" was confessed by him as something he said out of anger in an attempt to scare the person he was arguing with. He says he is extremely sorry for what he said and deeply regrets it, but he did say that he is telling the truth about him not being disruptive. Also, please do not decline this ban request because of what Entuziazm said. What his brother said is irrelevant and using what he said against Man of Kvass is extremely unfair and unethical.

Decline reason:

Man of Kvass is perfectly capable of making their own unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.