User talk:Malplaquet

Welcome!

Hello, Malplaquet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! --Ghirla ^-трёп- 18:38, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Luther Additions

Welcome! Thank you for the added detail! Would you do me a favor and cite your source for these? Thanks! --CTSWyneken^(talk) 17:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Wrightgrave.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wrightgrave.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Balenciaga.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Balenciaga.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. `'mikkanarxi 22:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Please DON'T ignore the text written on the file uploading page. All your further uploads with violations of colyrights will be deleted on sight. `'mikkanarxi 22:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:JeanPatou.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JeanPatou.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mainbocher.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mainbocher.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Schiaparelli.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schiaparelli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Vionnet.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vionnet.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Marbury v. Madison

I'm concerned about the tone of your edits to this article. Phrases like "Like countless streams flowing into a great river that snakes its way to the sea, so to did Marbury v. Madison had all manner of history flowing into it, and a fair amount of flotsam swept along with it" are not encyclopedic. We can't try to spice up the statements of fact with poetic metaphors, or by sliding into a conversational tone. Instead, our writing should strive to be precise, informative, and clear. Start with the Wikipedia:Manual of style to see what form of writing is acceptable. Also, please spell check your edits before you save them—much of what you have posted has had a number of typos. Thanks! Postdlf 19:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling and POV

Please consider using a spell check program for your edits. In addition to some of the problems relating to Marbury, there are spelling errors in your edits to the Louisiana Purchase entry. Additionally, some of your edits violate WP:NPOV, for example, in Proclamation of Neutrality, it's inappropriate to write that Madison "caved" to Jefferson, or that the proclamation set a "proud precedent" for future U.S. administrations. Cheers, JCO312 17:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is a program that will do spell checking, but I'll have to get back to you on it (I think its called AWB). I use Firefox version 2, which has a spell check built in.

As far as the POV, "caved" came across as particularly un-encyclopedic more than it is POV, so I suppose I should have been clearer about my objections to that. All of your examples, "he caved; he knuckled under; he threw in the towel" are cliches that could be written in a more professional manner. As far as "proud," vanity or not, it isn't a fact, it's your opinion. You're making a value judgment that the precedent is "proud" and that's not what editors are supposed to being doing. Cheers, JCO312 22:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reverted your additions

It appears that you copied a timeline from:

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/haywood/HAY_CHRO.HTM

for the Bill Haywood article. This is not allowed on Wikipedia, unless you have permission from that website. But also, the addition was inappropriate, as it did not fit the style of the rest of the article. Please don't do this again. Richard Myers 06:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced

Please odn't add /change huge texts without references to the sources and don't copy texts from other places. `'mikka 19:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

H.M.S Beaver

On February 7th you edited the Boston Tea Party article [1]. In particular, you changed Dartmouth, Eleanor, and Beaver to H.M.S Dartmouth, H.M.S. Eleanor, and H.M.S Beaver. I don't think this is correct. Please provide a source if available. - Crosbiesmith 21:57, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Manual of style

You were advised in January to read up on Wikipedia:Manual of style. I would urge you to do so once again, and in addition, to read WP:NOT. Many of your edits continue to read more as prose than as encyclopedic content. For instance, in the article on Sheldonian Theatre you wrote "Naming the building "The Sheldonian Theatre" was the least they could do". That is your opinion. It is not fact, and per WP:NOT, "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought."

As another example, in Victoria of the United Kingdom you wrote, "* Victoria cannot be considered beautiful, but she was attractive in her own way. Called "the little queen," she stood about 5 ft. She had bright blue eyes and long brown hair. However, she had a large, puffy face and a mouth that was amiable only when she smiled. Her appeal lay in her immense intelligence and her iron will, plus her sophistication and wit." In this example, Victoria's nickname, height, and the color of her hair and eyes are all facts (unsourced, but facts nevertheless). The remainder of the quote is your opinion regarding those facts, i.e. that she was not "beautiful", that she was "attractive in her own way", etc.

Your edits add much useful and interesting information, but I encourage you to review the Wikipedia guidelines so that you do so in conformity with the standards of this project. Cheers, JCO312 17:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excerpts from chronicles

While I know you mean to be helpful, you should reflect that medieval chronicles are not reliable sources per WP:RS. Furthermore, their English translations are most likely copyrighted. If you want to add them to the project, you should register an account in WikiQuote where they will be gratefully accepted. --Ghirla^-трёп- 14:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Wren GA Nomination

I have nominated Christopher Wren for GA status. As you're one of the main editors, would you be willing to help improve the article to meet GA requirements? Thanks, GoldRock23^{(talk - my page - contribs)} 15:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]