User talk:Malharhussain

This is Malharhussain's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thappu Thanda has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thappu Thanda was changed by Malharhussain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931866 on 2017-10-17T12:32:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sandalwood Talkies

Hello, Malharhussain,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sandalwood Talkies should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandalwood Talkies .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of PrakashGollapalli007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Maradona-Eng.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maradona-Eng.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Moothon Poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Moothon Poster.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malharhussain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm completely unaware of why am I blocked, I don't know who is the person PrakashGolapalli I'm linked with, to my knowledge I have uploaded and updated only rightful information. Only twice I did a mistake with copyright © issue, even though the makers of the film have given me authority to use the posters of their film, I chose ghe wrong category for copyright © I request to lift the suspension on my username. Kindly do the needful Thank you

Decline reason:

You are blocked as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007/Archive. A checkuser has determined that you have abused multiple accounts. You will need to list all of the accounts you have used. Sockpuppetry destroys the community's ability to trust the puppeteer. The earliest the community would consider unblocking you is 6 months from your last edit. You must make no edits for 6 months. You may not edit from another account or while not logged in. That would be block evasion, and would destroy any hope of the community trusting you again. Any appeal you make then should be from your original account. Thanks. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malharhussain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The wikipedia article attempted to create was an article of a renowned film distribution house of Kannada films, a regional language in India, since I have created many notable articles related to South Indian film industry, the owners of the Sandalwood Talkies approached me to help in creating a Wikipedia article for their distribution house, malharhussain is not a sock puppet account of PrakashGollapalli007 and I don't even know who that is, I kindly request the administrators to rectify the same and remove the block on my account

Decline reason:

That's totally inappropriate and a violation of our Terms of Use. It also confirms you were violating at least WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Malharhussain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what to do apart from just apologizing for the mistake done unknowingly, I kindly request some administrator to go through what I have done and remove the block on my profile, I also assure not to repeat the same

Decline reason:

Per above and below, this is a pretty clear violation of our terms of use and local policies and guidelines. In 6 months you may be eligible for the standard offer TonyBallioni (talk) 03:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to, at a minimum, disclose any and all employers who paid for your services with respect to Wikipedia, and where they asked you to edit. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Might I be so bold as to add that you read and heed my unblock decline above. This was not some random mistake you made. You cannot simply say, "O, sorry. Won't happen again." You need to clearly address each of the issues raised on your talk page as they are all parts of the reasons you are blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|I was not paid or have done any consideration to create a Wikipedia page, I strongly condemn this false allegation, the only mistake I did was to try and create a Wiki page for Sandalwood Talkies, a renowned distribution house based on its popularity & worthiness, but I didn't know I will be falsely called as a sock puppet account of some random person who has earlier tried to create a page for the same distribution house. Can someone guide me on how to contribute to Wikipedia further? & will the ban on me ever be revoked? :( }

"[T]he owners of the Sandalwood Talkies approached me to help in creating a Wikipedia article for their distribution house[...]" suggests otherwise. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 03:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm a learner in Wikipedia & I create many of the missing & significant articles related to South Indian Film Industry, because of that the owners sought for my assistance & I felt it was one of the important distribution houses, I assure Wikipedia page was not used as any promotional tool & to the interest of the readers & Wikipedia lovers never will I misuse/ abuse/ deviate from the core policy/ rules of Wikipedia" —Malharhussain 9:30, 1 February 2018 (IST)

"But if this dispute is not solvable or the ban imposed on me cannot be revoked/ rectified & the only way to resolve this is, I should not be contributing anything more on Wikipedia, then kindly someone tell that at least, Thank you." —Malharhussain 9:345 1 February 2018 (IST)

{unblock| PrakashGollapalli007: Unique pages:5 Edit count: 15 Normal edit time: 12:26:12.6 Blocklog: 2017-09-27T23:55:37Z ||block ||GeneralizationsAreBad ||Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007

Malharhussain: Unique pages:27 Edit count: 82 Normal edit time: 12:24:47.6219512195 Blocklog: 2018-01-28T21:08:51Z ||block ||Vanjagenije ||Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PrakashGollapalli007

Combined: 0 total edits to combined pages: Malharhussain: 0 PrakashGollapalli007: 0 total combined edits : 0

I'm not a sock puppet of any account, kindly help me with getting my Wikipedia account back}

Non-admin comment: At this time, WP:SO applies to you. What that means is that, no, you are not banned from Wikipedia forever, but you're pretty close to that. What you need to do is to stop editing Wikipedia for 6 months, and this includes talk page edits, and then come back. There's no guarantee that the community will welcome you, but you stand a far better chance of being unblocked than if you continue pestering the Administrators for an unblock. WP:SO is to help folks who have amassed a messy block log to start over afresh. I would like to add that " the owners sought for my assistance" is a pretty clear indication that you are violating WP:COI, even if you are not paid to do so. I would suggest that when and if your standard offer is accepted, and if you still want to contribute to Wikipedia about those articles, that you propose changes on the article's talk page(s), instead of directly editing them. Zyc1174 (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll wait for 6 months but there is an article to edit, what to do? (User Malharhussain)

Waiting six months means not editing articles. At all. Not yourself, not by asking others to edit. Then, apply under WP:SO which is certainly not a guarantee. You'll need to address your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK at that time, as well as your violations of WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. --Yamla (talk) 12:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aathmika (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Let her second movie release and then we can see if she satisfies WP:NACTOR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aathmika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aathmika, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malharhussain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dial911 (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Odavum Mudiyathu Oliyavum Mudiyathu

The article Odavum Mudiyathu Oliyavum Mudiyathu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film whose production does not meet WP:NFF guidelines; No release date and nothing significant found in WP:BEFORE search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ab207 (talk) 09:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]