Jump to content

User talk:Malgalmang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Malgalmang, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Malgalmang! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Maesil-cheong, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mogwa-cheong, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: Hi, Jim1138! It was a merger and I did adequately explained that it was. --Malgalmang (talk) 08:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't explain why you were merging it. Kind of like "removing content because I want to." Jim1138 (talk) 08:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jim1138: Well, not really. "Removing content because I want to" is completely different from merging articles. I was being bold following what Wikipedia:Merging says. Those articles are stubs that fit perfectly in the subsections of the article Cheong (food), as you see. You can oppose the merger, but accusing me of vandalism isn't appropriate in this case. --Malgalmang (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]