User talk:Makhlaghi
Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon 16 references added
[edit]Thank you very much, you are correct! This was my first Wikipedia full page submission! I have added 16 references for almost every fact mentioned in that page. I have submitted it for a review, could you kindly have a look?
Also, I am a researcher that is hired at CEFCA (subject of that page); I am not in the outreach of public relations department of CEFCA and this page is not meant as a promotion. This is just some objective facts that all have secondary/objective references. Could you also guide me on how to declare that?
Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 11:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much @Justiyaya. I have added several references to the text and submitted it. Also, in the talk page, I added a notice of COI. It would be great if you could have a look and let me know your thoughts so I can implement them. Mohammad Akhlaghi (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the COI notice, that is really appreciated. What would be your three best sources that provide reliable significant independent coverage? Justiyaya 04:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt reply. Here are the three references that best provide reliable independent coverage of the draft in my view (all of these were published before I joined CEFCA in 2021):
- Reference 1 is from the official state bulletin (which has legal status in Spain).
- Reference 2 is from a local news paper (which has its own editorial board). There are two other references like this from local news papers (references 4 and 5).
- Reference 9 is a scientific paper describing one of the astronomical surveys that is being done at CEFCA. Most of the references are scientific articles like this one: published in important scientific journals that are peer reviewed and edited. They objectively show (from the affiliation of the authors) that CEFCA is active in the scientific fields that are mentioned within the text; for example references 15 and 16 that are shown after the word "galaxy" are papers on galaxy evolution that CEFCA researchers have co-authored in galaxy evolution (I am not a co-author on any of them!).
- Mohammad Akhlaghi (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt reply. Here are the three references that best provide reliable independent coverage of the draft in my view (all of these were published before I joined CEFCA in 2021):
- Thanks for the COI notice, that is really appreciated. What would be your three best sources that provide reliable significant independent coverage? Justiyaya 04:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CEFCA (disambiguation)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CEFCA (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 12:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)