User talk:Makechanges1

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth Crowley, you may be blocked from editing. This is deliberate flouting of the rules and protocols I have helpfully supplied you earlier. Please note that Wikipedia is not your personal place to formate a webpage as you see fit. There are standards and expectations for every single page here. This is a level-3 warning because your actions are brazen and intentionally disruptive. JesseRafe (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makechanges1, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Makechanges1!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Your recent editing history at Elizabeth Crowley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Makechanges1. Seems incontrovertibly to be the same editor as Letsediteverything2 who was blocked for making the exact same disruptive edits on Elizabeth Crowley‎. JesseRafe (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Makechanges1 I'm just only want to warn you; Wikipedia has a very strict against of abusively using multiple accounts (socking) for attempting to deceive or mislead other users purposes, the CheckUser tool has a highly determining your behavior of IP's data "diffs" records in your account, and you'll get blocked indefinitely by any Wikipedia's administrator, don't try for Gaming the system using your alternative account Letsediteverything2 to engage an disruptive editing as you did an edit warring on October at Elizabeth Crowley's article if you're. SA 13 Bro (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try for Gaming the system, Wikipedia is not a battleground, if you get accused by any other users as socking, then get ready to say goodbye to your accounts. SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]