User talk:Majikalex32

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Majikalex32. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Majikalex32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why do you think that I had anything to do with the so called sock puppets? I only have one account. this one. surely you can see via my IP address that I only have the one account. guilty until proven innocent? user Yahboo has a vendetta against me because he would like to claim ownership of the Kate Fischer page.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was investigated and confirmed. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

im telling you, it was nothing to do with me... like I said I have one (static) IP address. where is the proof? Majikalex32 (talk) 12:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Majikalex32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason I was blocked is for edit warring. I notice since ive been blocked other editors and admin have edited the Kate Fischer article and reverted it back pretty much to what I had in the first place. so it seems that it was not me that was in the wrong in the first place, and perhaps I was being unfairly treated. once again I contend that I know nothing about multiple accounts. this is and always has been my only account. I will not edit war again.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:26, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Which all other accounts have you used to edit Wikipedia? Come clean and you would get a chance to edit again. Lourdes 05:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user:Lourdes this is the only wiki account I have ever had. surely you can tell by checking the IP's? like I said above I think I have been mistreated here. you should have blocked the other editors for reverting my additions to the article, instead of blocking me, or perhaps looked into the matter more. I still think Yahboo and Curdle should be banned for at least 24 hours for edit warring. why am I the one being punished. my edits were accurate. precise. clear and referenced. I tried to discuss on the talk page they ignored me. why I ask you?

Stop posting unblock requests with reasonings that do not address the issues at hand. I'm advising you to come clean – that's the only way to hope that you have a chance to get unblocked some time in the future, near or distant depending upon how any administrator perceives your coming clean. The track you've been treading (that you've done no wrong...) unfortunately goes against your editing history. If you continue posting repetitive unblock requests without addressing the said issues, your talk page access may be revoked. Lourdes 10:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Due to continuing personal attacks, which I've removed... If you have reasons to believe you should be unblocked, you can request an unblock using the process described at Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. Thanks and good bye, Lourdes 10:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]