Jump to content

User talk:Majidii1234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Majidii1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sultan Choudhury did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  S0091 (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content blanking

[edit]

In this edit to the article about Sultan Choudhury, you argued in the edit summary that Choudhury does not merit a Wikipedia article and that the article should be deleted. You are free to make that argument by nominating the article for deletion (see the Articles for Deletion process), but your attempts to simply remove well-cited material have not been reverted multiple times: do not do that again as repeated attempts to remove cited information will be seen as vandalism. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Majidii1234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your I have laid out the reasons regarding that page clearly and objectively, however it seems I have been targeted unfairly by the person who own this page and mobilised various users to attack me unreasonably. It seems to me because the editors Wikidan61 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BubbaJoe123456/wikidan61 did not have any valid argument they resorted to gang against me contribution and block me as a user. Is this the democracy of Wiki for contributes?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui  10:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.