User talk:Mailman5050

I don't want to start an edit war, but telling rather than showing is sort of the point of an encyclopedia. I take the point on all political organizations being controversial on some level, but the controversy is pretty elemental in this case -- particularly given the radical difference in the proclaimed purpose of the organization and the claims of critics.

A radical difference in the claims of supporters and critics in also present in both major parties and most of the candidates in them, but I can't find any other example of a lead section introducing them as being "controversial".

Mailman5050 (talk) 00:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Mailman5050