User talk:Mahabali varma

May 2018

Hello, I'm CataracticPlanets. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Agnivansha have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CataracticPlanets (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Pallava dynasty, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 17:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mahabali varma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Raju have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Raju. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discretionary sanctions on caste

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

--regentspark (comment) 01:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that "knowing" something personally is not a sufficient condition for adding material to wikipedia. If you continue to do so on the Raju page, you will be topic banned from any caste related edits and may end up blocked if you continue to do so after the topic ban. Everyone is welcome to edit on wikipedia but you must bring reliable sources to back up any content that you add. --regentspark (comment) 01:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kshatriya raju in andhra documents .not raju please search andhra forward caste .and please search andhra forward caste in Wikipedia

Please search andhra forward caste in Wikipedia Mahabali varma (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:V and WP:POV, and through WP:TUTORIAL if you haven't already. Wikipedia is not a platform to promote your caste. utcursch | talk 11:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for 31 hours, as you did at Raju. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 16:58, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a platform to promote your caste. If you continue to make these disruptive edits, you'll end up getting blocked indefinitely. Please have a look at WP:RS. utcursch | talk 13:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been banned from caste related pages

For persistent addition of unsourced caste content at Raju, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:

you have been indefinitely banned from making any edits to caste-related pages.

This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. --regentspark (comment) 17:38, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RegentsPark, now we have this. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at Raju. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. regentspark (comment) 12:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raju. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 07:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raju, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]