User talk:Magotteers

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Magotteers, please refrain from edit-warring on Western Azerbaijan. Thank you. Tuscumbia (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Hello Magotteers, please see this [1]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tuscumbia (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. My attention was drawn to your edits by Wikipedia:AN3#User:Magotteers reported by User:Tuscumbia (Result: ), a case recently filed at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Magotteers reported by User:Tuscumbia (Result: 72h). EdJohnston (talk) 00:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will not dispute the block, just one clarification, how am I treating Wikipedia as a battleground? Also, note that Anastasia had as much revert, how am I the only one blocked?

I don't see four reverts in 24 hours by Anastasia.Bukh (talk · contribs) on any article on November 10 or 11. EdJohnston (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry, it was three..., but how is this fair, four users reverting me, obviously I will end up being blocked. Note that Anastasia has moved an article unilaterally. On Western Azerbaijan a map which legend was removed was added, another which I have just removed had an innacurate description. Now neither person who reverted me even attempted to question my justification of the clarification of the map but yet they have reverted. Only after I have been reported, the inclusion of the map became irrelevant. Also, note this user: Garapapag, three years of innactivity and just came by reverting to Kheo17 version. Note all those IPs on Nagorno Karabakh war article. How am I the one being accused of battleground mentality, when I have justified both in summaries and talkpage. While this does not for you justify the edit warring, at least it should just justify that I do not have a battle ground mentality. Also, note that Anastasia has made unacceptable remarks such as: Robert Hewsen is of Armenian heritage which means his research is doubtful. That's the kind of argumentation I had in talkpages to justify reverts of my edits. It appears all those banning of users on Russian Wikipedia after they've caught them conspiring off wiki, has brought many of those users here, which result was more edit warring. Just keep an eye on this, will you? Magotteers (talk) 01:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

....Check the IPs on Karabakh war article. Magotteers (talk) 01:57, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a possibility to exchange the block with 1 week 1RR?

EdJohnson, this is unacceptable everyone knows (including him)that the thing in Green is not only Zankezur but also other regions, (the claims of the ADR during the Paris Peace conference). The thing in Green is what they have claimed as part of Azerbaijan which is currently part of Armenia. I removed it because not only the description is innacurate but it was a duplicate of the map in the intro. How can he be allowed to blindly revert?

Discussions

I removed this map, because its description on the botton as showing Zangezur is innacurate. There are other problems on that map, we see in it Xankandi a modern rename of the city, a city which did not even exist then. On north of Mingacevir, we see the reservoir which was only built in the 50s. In fact that map does not represent Zangezur in green, read its title: Itirilmish_Azerbaycan_torpaglari. it represent what its author claim to be Azerbaijan and what is in green is what is currently in the republic of Armenia which is claimed by its author as part of Azerbaijan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magotteers (talk • contribs)

Our articles on AA topics may well contain errors. I myself know little about this part of the world. Your best chance at getting errors fixed is to courteously post on talk pages. If you work through the various steps of WP:Dispute resolution and find that other editors respond improperly, then you may be able to get the attention of admins. A new editor who sets out to fix everything in the world himself, without discussing first, is likely to attract a lot of unfavorable comment. EdJohnston (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, will do, btw, can you check for kheo17 and Garapapag? Garapapag came in alone to revert for him. Magotteers (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]