User talk:Magnus368

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Magnus368! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terry Madenholm (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

[3], [7], [8], [9], and [10] are unreliable sources; doesn't seem to be notable for anything in particular, referring to significant coverage in secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terry Madenholm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Magnus368! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Mattdaviesfsic

Thank you for taking the time to review the draft. It's the first draft that I have created (still learning). I have made some changes (removed the references that you have kindly pointed as unreliable and added an additional source).

Magnus Magnus368 (talk) 14:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. Another editor will probably review it given I don't dabble in more recent submissions much. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I added a source and removed some unnecessary information. All the remaining sources are covering the subject fully and not just passing mentions. If you could have another look and just let me know if I have improved it, would be very helpful. Magnus368 (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]