User talk:Magdelyn
Welcome
[edit]
|
Hello
[edit]Hi Magdelyn. I'm afraid edits like this[1] indicate that you are either not familiar with wikipedia's rules or coming here to advocate for a cause. Please be aware that it is *your* responsibility to familiarize yourself with this site's rules and to abide by them. Our policies & guidelines are here to facilitate collaboration between people despite differences in opinion - any account that persistently demonstrates a disregard for the rules will have their editing privileges revoked--Cailil talk 19:36, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Dispute opened by Hermiod against Kgorman-ucb about men's rights
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Men's Rights". Thank you. --SarahStierch (talk) 13:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Notice of article probation on Men's rights
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- KillerChihuahua?!? 16:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, hey, I just realized - are you Ma99ie on Reddit? If so then of course you were already aware of the probation. If this is the case, please understand that the notification is intended to be an FYI, so editors don't innocently run afoul of the probation terms, and that offsite notification is not valid here on Wikipedia. If you are not that editor, my apologies and feel free to remove this message as unhelpful. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Note to reviewing admin: See threats here and subsequent edits (now hatted); credible given recent incidents. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Magdelyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Administrator has been stalking me on this and other websites. There is no threat. Admin obviously is biased, and should recuse himself because of the perception of said bias. Please inform this admit that stalking is unappreciated. You've been designated for termination (talk) 22:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Reads as a threat to me. Also, this seems quite WP:NOTTHEM. v/r - TP 22:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.