User talk:Maelbrigda
|
I have been editing pages on Scottish historians, primarily those linked with the university of aberdeen and i have a recurring problem. Links to David Ditchburn (historian and senior lecturer) keep going to the page of an australian comedien called John Ditchburn. How can i prevent this and also get searches to find my David ditchburn. Please help.
- Put the page on David Ditchburn (historian) and disambig both articles. Xiner (talk, email) 23:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
How do I add the speedy deletion box to a page please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maelbrigda (talk • contribs)
- Hi, Maelbrigda. There are different templates available that can be used to tag an article for speedy deletion, depending on the criteria. You can find the list of templates here. Just edit the page in question, and insert the template at the top of the article, filling in any additional, required information. Feel free to reply here if you need any more help. —XhantarTalk 19:40, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Your Wild_Lettuce page seems to be redundant - most of the info here is present on the Lactuca page - could they be merged and/or redirected? --Tomhannen 21:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Tomhannen - Sorry i didnt check lactula - just the common name. It could be merged or deleted or whatever but as a relative newbie i dont know how Maelbrigda 21:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
OK, I'll try and redirect to the other page if that's ok - not so experienced at this myself! --Tomhannen 21:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia's policy on copyrights. This article has already been replaced by a redirect to an older article, but I wanted to make sure you were aware of the policy for next time. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyright issue with Lime Flower
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lime Flower, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.naturedirect2u.com/Medicinal%20herbs/limeflowerherb.htm. As a copyright violation, Lime Flower appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lime Flower has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lime Flower and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lime Flower with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lime Flower.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 02:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyright issue with Witches Grass
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Witches Grass, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cgi.ebay.com/Witches-Magikal-Cupboard-Herb-Sampler-80-herbs_W0QQitemZ300079014940QQcategoryZ1523QQcmdZViewItem. As a copyright violation, Witches Grass appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Witches Grass has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Witches Grass and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Witches Grass with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Witches Grass.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 02:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Copyright Issues
[edit]Hi, I notice that many of the articles you've created are partly or entirely copied and pasted from other websites. Please review Wikipedia's copyright policies carefully and make sure that future contributions are in your own words. Thank you. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
hello thanks for the correction.......
[edit]Small Text
thanks alot —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sildenefil (talk • contribs) 20:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC).
Notable Old Gowers
[edit]Thank you for your help on the article. Much appreciated. The last task we have to do for now. An important one - is to double-check that no names in the master list of "all names" got accidentally "dropped" in the transfer to the alphabetical sections. Once we have done that - we can delete the "all names" list - and then it's done. After that it's a general matter of trying to improve the list - wikify names etc etc . But the hardest part has been done!! Thanks so much! Davidpatrick 00:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Songs about sex
[edit]Per WP:CSD, things the community agree should be deleted can't be started again. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about sex. There are similar, more recent discussions under similar titles. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 22:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Your opinion
[edit]Hi! I saw that you agree at Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll. I would like to point out that your poll is in Neutral section. If you want to vote for agree, please move your vote to corresponding section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Scheibenzahl (talk • contribs) 10:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Q-Tex
[edit]The article Q-Tex has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 13:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Maelbrigda, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.
If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :) This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man ✍ 01:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Aware Defeat Depression
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Aware Defeat Depression, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Aware Defeat Depression is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Aware Defeat Depression, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 19:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sue Hall
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sue Hall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- nothing on the page establishes notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NoCal100 (talk) 05:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Ken Bairden for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ken Bairden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Bairden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Blazin' Fiddles for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blazin' Fiddles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blazin' Fiddles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland
[edit]I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 10:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.
Nomination of Scale-and-platt for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scale-and-platt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.