User talk:Maduixa

Hello from Nick

Hello, Maduixa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ~ thesublime514 • talk • sign 21:28, April 8, 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Cetrdeset mucenika.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cetrdeset mucenika.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Pesic

I think there's something wrong with the image. When I go to Image:Cetrdeset mucenika.jpg and then click on the link "Image in higher resolution", it says, "The image “http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3f/Cetrdeset_mucenika.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.". Do you have a program like Paint Shop Pro or Photoshop that you could open the image with? The deleted image has the same problem - neither of them show up. When I ty to view the deleted image, I get "The image “http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=Image%3ANikola_Pesic_Pink.jpg&file=0furb8htcwrmm37xl3fopk72h4cr9pwq.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.". I would suggest trying to open the two images with an image editing program, then re-saving them.

As for tagging the image, the particular permission that the author gave you is important. Wikipedia does not accept images where the permission given is "to upload it to Wikipedia". The author needs to explicitly release the image under the GFDL, or another compatible license. If you contact this individual and he/she is willing to release the image inder that license, then here is what you should put on the image description page:

This photo is a picture of ______________.  It was taken by ____________.  He (or she) agreed to release it under the GFDL in personal correspondance.

==Licensing==

{{gfdl}}

I hope that helps. --BigDT 12:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The language, "he allowed me to upload it on Wikipedia" is probably not good. It would be better to (1) confirm with him that he intends for it to be released under the GFDL then (2) say "he agreed to release it under the GFDL in personal correspondance". --BigDT 12:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image looks fine now. As for placing comments in both places, I like to keep conversations readable, rather than spread out over different talk pages. That way, if the conversation needs to be referenced sometime in the future, it isn't a struggle to read it. By adding my comment on my talk page, there's an unbroken chain of our conversation. --BigDT 12:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Ibis.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Ibis.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx!

Is it possible to watch two different nicknames from one account? Wile E. Coyote (talk) 09:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ne mogu da ujedinim, jer sam ovde morao da uzmem drugi nick. Wile E. Coyote (talk) 09:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTNJ, hajde da prebacimo razgovor na srpsku njiki. Ovde sam (za sada) zavrsio, pa cu sada da odem da dodam reference itd. na nas clanak. Wile E. Coyote (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Пријевод

Hi, Jagoda!

I need your help for some translations.

Can you please translate articles about songs sr:Креће се лађа Француска and sr:Тамо далеко (with text of song in article, example on en wiki) into catalan and spanish language?

Of course, if you want, can and have time.

Thank you very much!

PS. You will get some awards if you do this. ;-) --93.87.142.136 (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki order

Hi Maduixa, could you try to put the Serbian interwiki links in alphabetical order like this? Graham87 15:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maduixa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maduixa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wikidot for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikidot, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikidot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]