Hello, Maduadih, and welcome to Wikipedia!
An edit that you recently made to Eugenics seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.
Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thanks[reply]
fr-0 | Cet utilisateur ne comprend pas le français ou seulement avec des difficultés notables. |
math-2 | This user can contribute with intermediate mathematical skills. |
| This user has ASD. |
| This user's time zone is UTC−06. |
| This user contributes with Twinkle. |
Mac | This user contributes using a Macintosh computer. |
vn-2 | This user talk page has been vandalized 2 times. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at NDTV. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at NDTV, you may be blocked from editing. Cheers! Fakescientist8000 17:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on NDTV. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 17:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- CambridgeBayWeather Would you mind taking a look at this users more recent contributions? They're being rather difficult, and I'm involved in the dispute. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Maduadih, you need to start a new section to achieve consensus. That section is an edit request. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]