User talk:Madscribbler

Dental caries

I removed your edit becuase it reads like an advertisement, at least the portion on synthetic enamel. The caries vaccine is already linked in the aritcle, and has an article of its own. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 14:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the solution is to write a brand new article on the synthetic enamel, for what it's worth, but written in a neutral point of view (i.e., not seeming to push the advantages of the synthetic to the reader). · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 14:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not disputing the legitimacy of the story. I simply thought it was pushing the benefits of this yet-untested new technology, like an advertisement. And like I said, there is already an article on the caries vaccine; perhaps some of the information you added to dental caries would be appropriate there. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 14:45, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to know, though, that I'm not trying to discourage you from editing here, and I hope I haven't. I think a lot of the information you added is based on good stuff, and I don't mean to insult. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 14:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Black ops

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I have responded there. --MelanieN (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored to the article the section you commented on, and there is discussion about it on the Talk:Black operation page if you want to discuss it. --MelanieN (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]