User talk:MadisonFerguson/Sexism of American Media Awards

I like a lot of the work you've done here, and I agree with the disdain towards the sexism and gender binaries enforced by award categories. However, I am afraid that the tone of the article is "biased." For an example, "Since the 1950’s The Grammy Awards have been the pinnacle of musical greatness" is not an objective statement. Maybe saying "Since the 1950's, attaining a Grammy Award in the United States has been seen by many musicians (cite a couple interviews with some US musicians) to be the pinacle of musical greatness." I want to emphasize that the writing is good, but that wikipedia's stance on "bias" might cause problems. I don't think you've added anything to the beginning body introducing the topic, but I am confident that you are on the right track. Your citations look good as well. – Jellocoup

I like the clear organization of this new page! But I think you need a lead of 2–3 sentences establishing the overall topic before jumping into show by show. MNmagistra (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography: A lot of good resources

Article: Great look/presentation. Seems kind of one-sided, meaning very focus on pushing against sexism but we are technically supposed to be neutral. Add more info for Tony's, and Oscars. Add more examples for Sexual harassments articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burve003 (talk • contribs) 03:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]