User talk:MadScientistX24

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

My scientific studies

Astronomy

I have been studying astronomy since I entered university and it is the first subject in science that I studied. My favourite part of the subject is Space, which is referred to as the Universe by other astronomers, but the main part I began looking into was the planets of the Solar System and outer space. I found it fascinating to find out the information of space/time, some of the knowledge I found on Wikipedia told me that the planets of the universe were billions of years old, because before time began, the Big Bang happened. Astronomy has been my most favourite subject when I was in school, and now I have studied it, I have become a highly knowledgable person.

Biology

My second scientific study Biology has been another one of my favourites since I finished my first year in university. I had been studying the subject because I found other sciences interesting, like astronomy, which I first studied the year before. I looked at some information about it on Wikipedia, and started doing biological experiments on objects like blood cells, intestines and other organs. Biology has been my second favourite subject in science because I can experiment on the things related to the subject.

Chemistry

My third favourite scientific subject chemistry has been somewhere in the middle of my favourites since I studied it in my third year at university. Just like the other two subjects, I looked on Wikipedia for information and started using compounds such as sodium chloride, acid, Potassium permanganate and alkalis for chemical reactions. Chemistry is at least half of my favourite subject in science but I have found it fascinating like the others because the experiments enhance your skills for becoming a scientist and leads to you being famous.

Physics and Materials science

My fourth scientific subject Physics has been my absolute favourite since I started studying the subject at university in my fourth year. I read encyclopedic information about it, which included statements about astronomy in it, this is because physics includes other subjects connected to it. I believe physics is my favourite subject in science because the information is highly scientific, especially physical cosmology, which has been made a template on Wikipedia. My fifth and final scientific subject Materials science is one of the best I have studied at university in my last year there. I experimented on materials like fabric, leather, steel, zinc and a few others, before reading and copying information off Wikipedia that I found before joining. I believe Materials science is one of the best subjects in science because it is as fascinating as all the other sciences and studying the materials will increase your knowledge skills.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MadScientistX24/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:MadScientistX24/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 18:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MadScientistX24! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 18:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MadScientistX24/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:MadScientistX24/sandbox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eagleash (talk) 19:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, MadScientistX24, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

I was not creating a hoax or trying to be humorous

This is an event that really happened, sir. I am not being rude but I did have evidence in there which would have been useful. @Eagleash:MadScientistX24 (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding words to the effect of 'this is not a hoax' at the top of the page and then linking to this page as a reference indicates otherwise to me; and presumably to the Admin. who deleted the sandbox also. If there was some encyclopedic value in the sandbox and you feel it should not have been deleted, please discuss with the Admin. who did so. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 19:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Celine Dion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say you are not doing vandalism but that is what your editing is. When your block is over, should you return to troll on Celine Dion-related pages or post any other rumors, you will be blocked indefinitely. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadScientistX24 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand and know what you have said, but I was not spreading a fake rumour, or trying to troll. I do not want to be rude but I am not a conspiracy theorist myself, and I read the policies and guidelines before joining Wikipedia. All I was doing was expanding the Celine Dion article, but I added citations to it, and there was evidence about her death, which I tried to include in it. I know she died because I read an article off a website called React2424, which explains the evidence I would have used while expanding Celine Dion’s Wikipedia page. I am incredibly sorry for adding the poorly sourced content persistently, and I will never do it again, which I promise.

Decline reason:

You linked to a site that is explicitly for pranking people. You are either trolling or manifestly incompetent. Either way, we'll have to leave you blocked in order to protect Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 15:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Liz: