User talk:MadCarrot01

Welcome!

Hello, MadCarrot01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Quwegga Project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Wracking ^talk! 00:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Quwegga Project

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Quwegga Project, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wracking ^talk! 00:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 00:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please... unblock me... i have important information and i regret any wrongdoing i did... please...

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks.

--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I vandalized an article by changing every "Quagga" to "Quwegga". Originally, I thought this was the correct spelling because all my life everyone I had spoken to on my favourite animal had called it a Quwegga (pronounced the same as Quagga). However, I told my friends what I was doing and they encouraged me to make a fairly offensive article correlating to Quwegga. I regret making this article, however I believe I was in the right originally. Albeit just uninformed. I have no desire to make edits similar, sticking until minor edits until I'm confident in my research. But my main focus if I get unblocked will be to make an article on a fairly underground artist called "Acidgvrl". I have done extensive research on this artist and feel very confident in my ability to write a reliable article to help Wikipedians who are interested.

Decline reason:

That you still think you were in the right shows you need to remain blocked. You don't yet understand how Wikipedia works. Hint: we have a specific policy that you must adhere to which would have prevented your misinformed understanding from having an effect here. Yamla (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MadCarrot01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please read my previous unblock request to understand why I wish to be unblocked, this is just to clear things up and respond to the admins response to my request. I need to specify that *at the time* I felt I was in the right (I chose the wrong grammar to explain this, and honestly didn't need to explain it at all). Since then I have learned what I did wrong and read many of the helpful pages on making successful edits and ensuring that mistake doesn't get repeated. If there is anything else I need to do to be unblocked that I have missed just tell me. Thanks a lot.

Decline reason:

It's not enough for you to just tell us that you understand- many people do this and then go right back to doing the same thing wrong. You need to demonstrate your understanding to us by doing as Yamla already asked you- to tell us the specific policy that, had you adhered to it, would have prevented your activities. Yes, this is a test. If you need time to locate that policy, that's fine- there is no deadline for requesting unblock. You can take all the time you need. 331dot (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.