User talk:MacyJohn

Welcome!

Hello, MacyJohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 20:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Association for Club Executives (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article must be built from information found in third-party sources (newspapers, magazines) that are independent of the subject of the article. Those sources must be referenced in-line with the text they support. No un-referenced material is allowed. Follow the Wikipedia manual of style for headings, and do not use bold in the article beyond the lead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Association for Club Executives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! MacyJohn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 14:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Association for Club Executives

Hello, MacyJohn. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Association for Club Executives".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tootsie's Cabaret Miami has been accepted

Tootsie's Cabaret Miami, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bombshells Restaurant & Bar (October 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello MacyJohn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MacyJohn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MacyJohn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. S0091 (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This

MacyJohn, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by InsertName for their contributions to Wikipedia.

has been completed MacyJohn (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MacyJohn. Do note you should not edit articles directly but rather make edit requests. Instructions are above but see also WP:Edit Request Wizard. You may also submit drafts to AfC for new articles, as was done for Draft:Bombshells Restaurant & Bar. I do want to make clear, I rejected the draft prior to noticing the possible paid issues. Please also be mindful of Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy along with WP:NOTPROMO. If you have questions, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) S0091 (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And take a look at WP:PEACOCK. S0091 (talk) 18:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. Hello,

I would like to know the standards for what is considered sufficiently notable. I read the article as to consideration. Bombshells Restaurant & Bar is mentioned in 2 other entries on Wikipedia. It is a growing brestaurant chain mentioned here.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Breastaurant

Is is also here. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/RCI_Hospitality_Holdings

What made these entries below notable enough to have entries and not Bombshells? Any advise will help.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Redneck_Heaven

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bikinis_Sports_Bar_%26_Grill

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ojos_Locos

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/WingHouse_Bar_%26_Grill MacyJohn (talk) 14:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFF regarding existing articles. Criteria changes overtime generally becoming more strict so an article created years ago may not meet today's guidelines. A recent example is athletes. The criteria changed a couple years ago so there are thousands of existing articles about athletes that no longer meet the criteria but any new articles must meet the updated criteria. The notability criteria for organizations/businesses is WP:NCORP so please read that paying special attention to the rather long but most important WP:ORGCRIT section. The only usable source for Draft:Bombshells Restaurant & Bar is the Chron piece but it's weak for notability given most of it is statements by those affiliated (Simmons). It could simply be too soon, meaning there are not sufficient sources for it meet notability right now but may some time in the future. S0091 (talk) 15:41, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]