User talk:Macho

This user may have left Wikipedia. Macho has not edited Wikipedia since July 14, 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Re : Signature

Hi Macho,

Click on Preferences, and make sure that the option raw signatures is not accidentally checked. This should solve your problem.

Once again, welcome! If you have any further questions or problems, let me know!

- Mailer Diablo 02:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NED

this edit war is silly

Every edit war that this particular anon decided to engage in (practically anything I edit) is silly. I don't make it a habit of attempting to justify myself in detail, routinely, and repeatedly, to a "wikistalker". --TJive 06:13, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can STFU TJive. I simply chose to clean up your messy pro-American propaganda, and will continue to do so.

Revert

Yes, you removed signed comments by other users, without explaining why. — Mar. 13, '06 [23:26] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

Specifically, refer to the section under Line 61 of this diff. — Mar. 13, '06 [23:28] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

HeartattaCk

Would you be able to lend a hand on either contributing reliable sources for this article or providing your opinion on the corresponding AfD? PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, didn't see this until now. Too late, I guess. Macho Philipovich 17:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 11:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Image reuse attribution

The way you attributed the photo on your site is just fine. Thanks for letting me know about how you used it! —GrantNeufeld (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Macho! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jose Palafox - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jose Palafox

The article Jose Palafox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:MUSICBIO and WP:PROF notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 00:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pettigrew engler.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pettigrew engler.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maitland / Toussaint

Thank you for your addition. Someone who cares enough about Maitland still needs to step to the plate (American baseball expression, DK if that resonates) and explain the deal more. That blockquote I pulled from the book on the Federalist era is nothing more than a ball marker (golf term). It feels like I put it there over a year ago. Frank Lynch (talk) 01:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Macho. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]