User talk:Macedonia1913

You're invited to the Teahouse.

Hello! Macedonia1913, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! - Flori4nKT A L K 15:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Macedonia1913! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, United Macedonian Diaspora article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't push an agenda on Wikipedia

Hi Macedonia1913,

Please do not push an agenda on Wikipedia, this is not a platform for activism, I have come to this assumption due to you being an alleged member of the United Macedonian Diaspora as well as your recent edits. Rather than trying to defame entities that you disagree with it will be better if you and your associates contribute to Wikipedia rather than pushing an agenda that you make contributions on Wikipedia that will allow people to learn more about North Macedonia and Macedonians.

Ultimately I have nothing against you, ethnic Macedonians or the United Macedonian Diaspora and trust me when I say this I don't enjoy having to revert your edits constantly ,originally I nominated the UMD page as it had lack of coverage and I did so the second time again for the same reasons which were exacerbated by the canvassing/meatpuppetry that the organization that you are associated with it were doing. In hindsight after the debate I will support the creation of a UMD page after I saw the support it had by Macedonian editors who made the point that it is important for the Macedonian community. However,I will still stick to my values of objectivity and accuracy, we got off on a bad note but hopefully we can turn things around with your other friends. I would suggest that you and your two partners join the https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_North_Macedonia to find Macedonian related articles and also have a mature mindset of 'don't do what you don't want done to you' which will help to reduce the conflicts that you guys frequently have with Albanian, Greek and Bulgarian editors on this platform.

If you need anything let me know,

--James Richards (talk) 02:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your accusations are blatantly false accusations. No agenda at all. A New York Times alert came out today in my Google news feed on Roma bigotry in Bulgaria and listed 3 politicians from Bulgaria and their racist rhetoric on Roma - I found it appropriate to make sure the public is aware of these statements that are offensive to Roma peoples. I have no affiliation with the said-organization. However, your calling for its deletion twice raises red-flags clearly, and seems like you have a personal vendetta against it. I'm not sure who the two partners you are referring to, I'm single.

If you support the creation of a page for United Macedonian Diaspora - then be the example and recreate it. You were the one who had it deleted twice. Macedonia1913 (talk) 02:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well we both know what the reality is around UMD and you three + MuzoKral, ultimately you can waste your time pushing an agenda or do something positive for the Macedonians by improving articles that they will be interested in. I strongly suggest you check out https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_North_Macedonia, on there there is a to-do list of articles that need improving and creating that have to do with North Macedonia and Macedonians.

Look I will take good faith in your latest edits and revert my reverts, but please take a good think about what you and your partners are doing on this platform and whether it is beneficial for anyone.

--James Richards (talk) 02:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You already reverted them so I will leave them as it is assuming good faith this time.

--James Richards (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You should have a good read of WP:PERSONALATTACKS. Macedonia1913 (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About edit in Human rights in Bulgaria

Please check out your edit at, most of what you have added is unsourced and using a lot of adjectives which is a sign of pushing an opinion. Furthermore it has the three Bulgarian politicians that you have edited already which is another sign that this is an organized attempt to push an agenda. Please look into this and make the necessary changes.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Human_rights_in_Bulgaria

--James Richards (talk) 11:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aleks Taleski has been accepted

Aleks Taleski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleks Taleski

The article Aleks Taleski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleks Taleski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleks Taleski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleks Taleski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]