User talk:Maccabipage

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Maccabipage! I am Epeefleche and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Epeefleche (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maccabi Tel Aviv B.C.

You need to stop editing according to every half story that is published in the media : Omri Casspi hasn't officialy signed , Rashad McCants as well , Jeremy Pargo is still Maccabi's player until Maccabi officialy announce otherwise Maccabit (talk) 10:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you nuts? All I did was remove Pargo from our roster, only after Maccabi announced that he left the team: http://www.maccabi.co.il/News.asp?id=3084

As a matter of fact, you need to stop deleting my changes of the Maccabi page. I wrote our history section and enriched it with the amazing "achievements by season" section. This has cost me a lot of time and effort, and it is disgraceful behaviour on your part to just delete my work as you please. My work is based on official announcements, and the fact that Casspi will sign very soon has been made public by leading Maccabi officials.Maccabipage (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

About the history it was unintentional so I am sorry but about the roster changes non of the things you chancged isn't a "done deal" There were only an article that there is some trouble with his contract but no official announcment that he is no longer Maccabi's player and as a prove he is still on Maccabi's official site roster . Wikipedia is about facts and not every step in proccess should result in changes In the profile .Bottom line : Pargo is still Maccabi's player according to every official roster published as well as Casspi and McCants aren't 19:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

ARBIA warning

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Details of these sanctions can be found by following the link in the information box at the top of Talk:San Remo conference. They include a 1RR restriction that you have just violated at San Remo conference. I invite you to revert yourself in order to avoid being reported. Zero^talk 13:47, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maccabipage reported by User:Nableezy (Result: ). Thank you. nableezy - 14:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC) 14:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Your recent editing history at San Remo conference shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RolandR (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Maccabipage reported by User:RolandR (Result: ). Thank you. RolandR (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The 3RR complaint is an open-and-shut case. The article is under WP:1RR which is especially strict. You have reverted so many times that you would normally be blocked by any admin. If you agree to stop editing the San Remo conference article for seven days, there is a chance that you might avoid sanctions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating WP:3RR on the page San Remo conference,

you have been blocked from editing for 36 hours. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Bbb23 (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

Talkback

Hello, Maccabipage. You have new messages at RolandR's talk page.
Message added 14:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RolandR (talk) 14:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at San Remo conference shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Despite my earlier detailed explanation, and despite warnings from other editors, you have returned from your recent block and immediately continued with exactly the same disruptive edit which led to the block. I advise you not to repeat this behaviour, but to read the links which I gave you, so that you can learn exactly what sort of edit is permitted, and what is not permitted, in Wikipedia articles. Continuing on your present course is likely to lead to a further, lengthier block . RolandR (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at San Remo Conference

The following sanction now applies to you (in accordance with the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions):

Banned for six months from the topic of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict on all pages of Wikipedia, including talk.

You have been sanctioned for continued edit warring at San Remo conference after warnings and a block.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at WP:ARBPIA#Final decision. This sanction has been recorded on the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a topic ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal. If you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]