User talk:MacarangaChic

This user may have left Wikipedia. MacarangaChic has not edited Wikipedia since 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is MacarangaChic's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Reply

I don't seem to know about it and I do not even owned the account of Abcassionchan, so please remove that damn notice. MacarangaChic (talk) 05:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not until you explain how you were able to find a user subpage for an editor who has a history of sockpuppetry. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 05:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was contributing to any pages without category. Anyway, I do not owned that account at all. MacarangaChic (talk) 05:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible, on both counts. You first assert that you found it in a category, but it had no category listings until you added some. Then you changed your reply to state you were looking at pages without categories, but pages without categories aren't listed unless tagged. So you are, apparently, lying. Care to try again? 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not but I do not owned that account at all. MacarangaChic (talk) 06:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For a new user, you seem to have a very good grasp of Wikipedia. You immediately add Twinkle, proactively refute any experience on your user page, and after a few edits home in on a page that is not easily found. Sounds like a WP:DUCK to me. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 07:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ho, it does. :) MacarangaChic (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing due to sockpuppetry. You are blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Abcassionchan. If you would like to appeal this block, please add {{unblock|your reason here}} to this talk page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MacarangaChic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not own that account and I do not know this person. MacarangaChic (talk) 01:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems odd that you don't know who owns that account, given that you both edit from the same non-public computer. Post your next appeal from your main account, and stop lying. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To reviewing admin: please see this user's deleted contributions, especially the ones at User:Roundingdown/Riley Keli and User:Roundingdown/Burned (Riley Keli album) (User:Roundingdown is a sock of User:Abcassionchan as well). Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't knew that the account is a sock of that account. What can I do to unblock my account as I do not own that account? MacarangaChic (talk) 01:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only way you could have possibly found that subpage is if you created it. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I swear I did not create that page. I found the page when I was editing an article. Please, I really did not own that account. MacarangaChic (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the talk page of an article created by User:Roundingdown and edited by User:Abcassionchan? Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mean this. MacarangaChic (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying that even though four of the articles/subpages you edited were also edited by Roundingdown or Abcassionchan, you aren't a sockpuppet of them? Give me a break. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and I will give you a break. MacarangaChic (talk) 02:14, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser evidence confirms that these accounts are operated from the same computer. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]